Effect of Bagging Materials on Quality of Black jack Fig
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study on types of fig fruit bagging was studied by 4 types of fruit bagging materials, including satin transparent bags, white paper bag, brown carbon bag and synthetic fabric bag by experimenting with un bagged. It was found that the brown carbon bag was the only material that was impermeable to light. The color of the fruit after bagged in all shades was significantly different. The L*, a*, b* color values, choma (c*) hue angle (h๐), the brown carbon bag were different from other materials. The L* color value increased after fruit bagged, while the a* color value showed that the brown carbon bag had the lowest a*color value after bagging. The brown carbon bag had the most valuable of b* color value. As a result, figs bagged in brown carbon bags had higher values of c* and h๐ than other bagging materials. Unbagged and bagging with satin transparent bag had greater fruit width than bagged with other materials. As for the increase in fruit height, the fruit bagged in satin transparent bags had a greater increase in fruit height than the white paper bags and brown carbon bag. As for fruit weight, unbagged fruit had more weight per fruit than brown carbon bag and synthetic fiber bag and total soluble solids content was not significant different.
Article Details
References
Butkrachang, S., & Meakbungwan, A. (2008). Preharvest and postharvest effects of fruit wrapping materials to diseases control and fruit quality of Mangifera indica L. cv. Mahachanok (Research report). Lampang: Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna Lampang. (in Thai)
Chairauengyoth, T. (2008). Commercial cultivation of figs. Accessed March 8, 2022. Retrieved from https://www.rakbankerd.com/agriculture/print.php?id=1822&s=tblplant. (in Thai)
Chantakarak, L. (2003). Costs and returns on figs planting under the royal project foundation. (Master’s thesis). Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University. (in Thai)
Chatsuwan, N., & Areekul, V. (2010). Color parameters, total phenolic and anthocyanin content in various rice cultivars. Proceedings of the 48thKasetsart University annual conference: Agro- industry (pp. 252-260). Bangkok: Kasetsart University. (in Thai)
Maichoo, S. (2007). Effects of bagging on chemical compositions and color pigments of fresh longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) cv. Daw. (Master’s thesis). Chiang Mai. Maejo University. (in Thai)
Ma, Y., Zhao, M., Wu, H., Yuan, C., Li, H. & Zhang, Y. (2021). Effects of fruit bagging on anthocyanin accumulation and related gene expression in Peach. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 146(4), 217-223.
Minwong, T. (2004). Effect of light on anthocyanin and antifungal compounds productions and postharvest quality of Mahajanaka mango fruit. (Master’s thesis). Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University. (in Thai)
Monkong, J., Komkhuntod, R., & Wanichkul, K. (2010). Effect of bagging materials on fruit growth of Annona hybrid cv. Phetch Pakchong. Proceedings of the 48th Kasetsart University annual conference: Plants (pp. 16-23). Bangkok: Kasetsart University. (in Thai)
Nampradit, J. (2001). Development, harvesting indices and postharvest changes in bagged and nonbagged fruits of santol (Sandoricum koetjape (Burm. F.) Merr.) cv. Pui-phai. (Master’s thesis). Bangkok: Kasetsart University. (in Thai)
Sharma, R. R., Sanikommu, V. R. R., & Jhalegar, J. (2014). Pre-harvest fruit bagging: A useful approach for plant protection and improved post-harvest fruit quality- A review. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 89(2), 101-113. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2014.11513055.
Suksomboon, A. (2016). Fig: Popular economic crops of Nakhon Nayok Province. Accessed January 22, 2022. Retrieved from https://esc.doae.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/มะเดื่อฝรั่ง.pdf. (in Thai)
Wanichkul, K., Banjoedchoedchu, R., & Harach, S. (2006). Influence of bagging methods on surrounded atmosphere and growth of guava fruits (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Yen Song. Proceedings of the 44th Kasetsart University annual conference: Plants (pp. 335-342). Bangkok: Kasetsart University. (in Thai)
Wanichkul, K., & Harach, S. (2002). Effect of bagging materials on fruit growth and quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Yen Song. Agricultural Science Journal, 33(1-3), 17-32. (in Thai)
Wanichkul, K., & Subrungroeng, P. (2011). Effect of bagging materials on fruit quality of “B17” carambola. Proceedings of the 49th Kasetsart University annual conference: Plants (pp. 249-256). Bangkok: Kasetsart University. (in Thai)
Wilaiporn, S. (2011). Effects of fruit bagging and degreening on fruit quality of mandarin cv. sainam pueng. (Master’s thesis). Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University. (in Thai)
Yang, W. H., Zhu, X. C., Bu, J. H., Hu, G. B., Wang, H. C., & Huang, X. M. (2009). Effect of bagging on fruit development and quality in cross-winter off-season longan. Scientia Horticulturae, 120(2), 194-200.
