Structure of Fish Communities in Chi River Categorized by Trophic Levels: Trend and Variation

Main Article Content

สถาพร ชื่นใจ
จรุงจิต กรุดพันธ์
Tuantong Jutagate

Abstract

This study examined the structure of fish communities in the Chi River, as categorized by trophic levels, to compare and investigate trend of changes through various indices. Data from the catch per unit effort, (CpUE) during fishery monitoring surveys in the Chi River between 2008 and 2020 were used. It is found that at least 171 species of fishes inhabited in the Chi River, mostly belonging to Family Cyprinidae. The mean CpUE was 1.03 ± 0.20 kg per day. Species Richness averaged at 17 ± 2 species and the mean trophic level of fish in the community was 2.88 ± 0.09. The ratio of forage - to carnivorous - fishes (F/C ratio) was 3.25:1. The long term variation in CpUE, i.e. coefficient of variation, ranged from 62% to 72%. Absolute and relative short-term variations were between 60% - 73% and 67% - 76%, respectively. From the results, it could be concluded that the fish community structure in the Chi River was still balanced, but highly fluctuated in each trophic level. The results should be taken into consideration for further planning in fish resource management in the Chi River.

Article Details

Section
Research paper

References

Ratanalertnusorn, S. 2007. Principles of Conservation and Biological Management. Bangkok: Fine Print. (in Thai)

Office of National Water Resources Region. 2021. Watershed Information No.04 Chi River Basin. http://onwr3.onwr.go.th/?page_id=419. Accessed 1 March 2022. (in Thai)

Vidthayanon, C. 2017. Checklist of Freshwater Fishes in Thailand. Bangkok: Office of Natural Resources and Environment Policy and Planning. (in Thai)

Fisheries Development Policy and Planning Division. 2018. Fisheries Statistics of Thailand 2018. https://www4.fisheries.go.th/local/file_doc ument/20210129094223_new.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2022. (in Thai)

Behrenfeld, M.J. 2014. Climate-mediated dance of the plankton. Nature Climate Change. 4(10): 880-887.

Pauly, D. and et al. 1998. Fishing down marine food webs. Science. 279: 860-863.

Zhang, M. and et al. 2012. Trophic level changes of fishery catches in Lake Chaohu, Anhui Province, China: Trends and causes. Fisheries Research. (131-133): 15-20.

Shin, Y.J. and et al. 2005. Using size-based indicators to evaluate the ecosystem effects of fishing. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 62(3): 384-396.

Jutagate, T. and et al. 2012. Variations, trends and patterns of fish landings in large tropical reservoirs. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management. 17(1): 35-53.

Vidthayanon, C., Karnasuta, J. and Nabhitabhata, J. 1997. Diversity of Freshwater Fish in Thailand. Bangkok: Office of Environmental Policy and Planning. (in Thai)

Vidthayanon, C. 2008. Field Guide to Fishes of the Mekong Delta. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission.

Phanitwong, N. 2020. Thai freshwater fish. Bangkok: P̣arbpim Printing. (in Thai)

Froese, R. and Pauly, D. 2022. FishBase. http:// www.fishbase.org. Accessed 20 February 2022.

Swingle, H.S. 1950. Relationships and Dynamics of Balanced and Unbalanced Fish Populations. Alabama: Agricultural Experiment Station of the Alabama Polytechnic Institute.

Funchess, M.J. 1950. Relationships and Dynamics of Balanced and Unbalanced Fish Populations Bulletin No.274. Alabama: Agricultural Experiment Station of the Alabama Polytechnic Institute.

R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 1 March 2022.

Buijse, A.D., van Densen, W.L.T. and Machiels, M.A.M. 1991. Characteristics in the annual variation of yield from professional fisheries in freshwater bodies of the temperate and the tropical zones. In: Cowx, I.G. (ed.) Catch and Effort Sampling Strategies their Applications in Freshwater Fisheries Management. London: Fishing News Books.

Quinn, J.W. and Kwak, T.J. 2011. Fish assemblage changes in an Ozark River after impoundment: A long-term perspective. Transaction of the American Fisheries Society. 132: 110-119.

Dudgeon, D. 2011. Asian river fishes in the Anthropocene: Threats and conservation challenges in an era of rapid environmental change. Journal of Fish Biology. 79(6): 1487-1524.

Kasamesiri, P. and Thaimuangphol, W. 2020. Microplastics ingestion by freshwater fish in the Chi River, Thailand. International Journal of GEOMATE. 18(67): 114-119.

Seanghong, S. and et al. 2021. Fish diversity, habitat preference and assemblage patterns during the dry season in the upper Petchaburi River, Thailand. Journal of Fisheries and Environment. 45(3): 100-111.

Rainboth, W.J. 1996. Fishes of the Cambodian Mekong. Rome: FAO Species Identification Field Guide for Fishery Purposes.

Penczak, T. 2007. Can velocity affect growth and fecundity of facultative riverine fish species? Polish Journal of Ecology. 55(2): 357-366.

Jutagate, T. and et al. 2005. Changes in the fish catches during a trail opening of sluice gates on a run-of-the river reservoir in Thailand. Fisheries Management and Ecology. 12(1): 57-62.

Jutagate, T., Thappanand, T. and Tabthipwan, P. 2007. Is sluice gate management beneficial for spawning migrations? The case of the shark catfish (Helicophagus waandersii) in the Mun River below the Pak Mun Dam, Thailand. River Research and Applications. 23(1): 87-97.

Hydro and Agro Informatics Institute (Public Organization). 2012. Data Collection and Analysis Operations. Project to Develop a Data Warehouse System for 25 Watersheds and a Model for Flooding and Drought. https://tiwrm.hii.or.th/web/attachments/25basins/04-chi.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2022. (in Thai)

Pauly, D. and Palomares, M.L. 2005. Fishing down marine food webs it is far more pervasive than we thought. Bulletin of Marine Science. 76(2): 197-211.

Ngor, P.B. and et al. 2019. Maintaining perspective of ongoing environmental change in the Mekong floodplains. Environmental Sustainability. 8(8947): 1-12.