Species Composition and Index of Relative Importance of Coastal Species Caught by Collapsible Crab Trap in Ban Don Bay

Main Article Content

Amonsak Sawusdee
Kanyarat Ngamcharoen
Apirak Songrak
Suwit Wuthisuthimethavee

Abstract

The study on species composition of coastal species caught by collapsible crab traps in Bandon Bay, Surat Thani Province was investigated between October, 2017 and November, 2018. The traps used were rectangular shape of 35x55x17 cubic centimeter. There was three types of mesh used including Type 1 had mesh size of 1 inch net around the body, Type 2 had mesh size of 1 inch net on top and the sides but 2.5 inches on the bottom, and Type 3 had mesh size of 1 inch net around the body. The totally of 26 orders 61 families and 118 species were observed. Crab trap type 1 showed the highest species caught of 109 species, while 98 and 68 species were collected by type 2 and type 3, respectively. Statistics proved that catch per unit effort of crab trap type 1 had significantly higher than type 2 and 3 (P value ≤ 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in number and weight of Blue swimming crab (BSC) caught by three types of trap (P value ≥ 0.05). The index of relative importance indicated that Charybdis affinis, Portunus pelagicus, Takifugu oblongus, Dorippe quadridens, were commonly observed and dominant in Bandon Bay. This finding indicated that using trap type 1 to catch BSC possibly resulted to the reduction of bycatch biomass in Bandon Bay. For sustainable management, this study suggested that encouraging the fishermen to use crab trap of type 3 can reduce exploitation rate of bycatch species in Bandon Bay.

Article Details

Section
Research paper

References

[1] Nootmorn, P. (2017). The management of fishery habitat for sustainable fishery. Fishery department, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
[2] Miguel V. A., Cherry, P. A., Yousuke, K. and Sanae, T. (2007). Effect of two collapsible pot designs on escape rate and behavior of the invasive swimming crabs Charydis japonica and Portunus pelagicus. Fisheries Research, 85: (202–209).
[3] Juntarashote, K. (1998). Community based fishery management. Thai Research Funding Agency, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
[4] Sawusdee, A. (2007). Management proposal for Bandon Bay and its islands. Walailak University, Thailand. (in Thai)
[5] Holim, S. (2009). The preliminary study of catch efficiency of collapsible trap in Tungka Bay, Chumporn. Maejo University, Chumporn, Thailand. (in Thai)
[6] Phomikong, P., Hawanon, V. and Koonkalya, S. (2006). Species composition of crab trapin Ranong province. Proceedings of the 44th Technical Conference of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Thailand. (in Thai)
[7] Jayangkoon, N. and Ekbao, C. (2014). The project of lesson development: Bandon ecosystem. Thai Research Funding Agency, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
[8] Niumnoot, N. and Purisumpun, R. (2014). Value chain of aquatic animals in Bandon Bay. Suratthani Rajabhat University, Suratthani, Thailand. (in Thai)
[9] Nelson, J. S. (2006). Fishes of the world (4th eds.). NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
[10] Carpenter, K. E. and Niem, V. H. (eds.). (1999a). The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific (Volume 3. Batoid fishes, chiamaeras and bony fishes part 1 Elopidae to Linophrynidae). Rome, Italy: FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purpose. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[11] Carpenter, K. E. and Niem, V. H. (eds.). (1999b). FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purpose. The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific. (Volume 4. Bony fishes part 2 Mugilidae to Carangidae). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[12] Carpenter, K. E. and Niem, V. H. (eds.). (2001a). The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific. (Volume 5. Bony fishes part 3 Menidae to Pomacentridae). Rome, Italy: FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purpose. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[13] Caddy, J. F. and Sharp, G. D. (1986). An ecological framework for marine fishery investigations. (Technical Paper 283). Rome, Italy: FAO Fisheries.
[14] Samukphan, L., Teanpru, P., Dumrungrote, P. and Kunsook, C. (2016). Biodiversity and utilization of bycatch species from collapsible crab trap in Kung Krabaen Bay, Chantaburi. Proceedings of the 7th Technical Conference of Plant Genetic Conservation Project Under the Royal Initiation of Her Royal Highness Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn, Chantaburi, Thailand. (in Thai)
[15] Oasompoon, P., Ubonsuwan, J. and Roungprim, R. (2006). The study of optimal trap mesh size for Blue swimming crab fishery in Phang Nga Bay. Fishery department, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
[16] Kunsook, C., Pangpaiboon, P., Puttarak, S., Sangsri, P. and Katinsri, S. (2016). The comparison of collabsible crab trap in Kung Krabaen, Chantaburi. Burapha Science Journal, 22: (96-109)
[17] Bootsun, S. and Arimato, T. (2011). The comparison of catch volume from crab trap fishery between small and large fishing boats in upper Gulf of Thailand. Proceedings of the 45th Technical Conference of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Thailand. (in Thai)