The The Development of a Computer Program to Evaluate the Teaching Performances for the Royal Thai Naval Academy Classes.

Abstract

The objectives of this research are as follows. 1) to develop a computer program which has the following 3 main features. Firstly, the program can protect individual rating information. Secondly, the program has the ability to determine whether a student has done or has not done the assessment. Lastly, the program can show the results of the assessment covering all teaching ability areas. 2) to evaluate the quality of the program by computer experts. 3) to evaluate the satisfaction of the program by users. The samples in 2) and 3) are selected using purposive sampling including 2 Master's degree computer experts and 19 users. The tools used in this research are as follows. 1) tools related to the designed computer program are OOP (Object-Oriented Programming) for methodology, Visual Studio Code for coding, PHP for backend algorithm, HTML CSS and JavaScript for user interfaces, MySQL for managing databases, Apache Web Server for serving the application to internet connected devices. 2) Quality assessment for computer experts in 4 areas which are analysis and system design, program accuracy, convenience and ease of use, and program security. 3) Satisfaction questionnaire for users of the program in 5 areas which are program manual, program functions, convenience and ease of use of the program, program components, user interface of teaching assessment results, and program security. The statistics used for data analysis were mean and standard deviation. 

The results show as follows. 1) The computer program from this research has 3 main features as in the requirement. It can protect individual detail rating, can identify students who have completed all the assessment or have not yet finish the assessment for each course and can show the results of the assessment cover all each teaching ability areas. 2) The evaluation from the computer experts are as follows. The quality of the program is very good in analytical and design quality (). The accuracy of the program (). The ease of use of the program is very good (). The program security is very good () 3. The satisfaction assessment from users are as follows. The program manual satisfaction is very good (). The program function satisfaction is very good (). The convenience and ease of use of the program is very good. The program components are very good (). The user interface of teaching assessment results is very good (). The program security is very good ().