Influence of Soil Chemical Properties and Arsenic Species on Arsenic Accumulation of Typha angustifolia (L.) in Submerged Soil Condition
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Typha angustifolia (L.) is a plant capable of removing arsenic from soil by absorbing it from soil to accumulate in the plant. This research aimed to study influence of soil chemical properties and arsenic species on arsenic accumulation of T. angustifolia in submerged soil condition. The soil chemical properties to be studied were pH, oxidation reduction potential (Eh), extractable iron, exchangeable aluminium, exchangeable magnesium, exchangeable calcium and available phosphorus. This research was a 3 × 4 factorial design consisting of 2 factors. The first factor was soil type including soil without arsenic (control), soil with arsenite [As(III)] and soil with arsenate [As(V)]. The second factor was the cultivation period of T. angustifolia including 15, 30, 45 and 60 days. The chemical properties of all soil types were examined before planting T. angustifolia and total arsenic accumulation of T. angustifolia was examined after planting T. angustifolia for 15, 30, 45 and 60 days. The results demonstrated that pH, Eh and the amounts of exchangeable aluminium, exchangeable magnesium and available phosphorus were not significantly different among all soil types. The amounts of extractable iron in the soils with arsenite and arsenate were significantly higher than that in the control soil. The amounts of exchangeable calcium in the soil with arsenate and the control soil were significantly higher than that in the soil with arsenite. Furthermore, it was also found that T. angustifolia accumulated arsenite better than arsenate at all examination periods. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that factors capable of being used to predict total arsenic accumulation of T. angustifolia were oxidation reduction potential, arsenic species and exchangeable calcium. The prediction equation was TAA = 197.834 - 0.350 (Eh) + 25.150 (AS) - 0.218 (Ca) where TAA = total arsenic accumulation of T. angustifolia, Eh = oxidation reduction potential, AS = arsenic species and Ca = exchangeable calcium.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ วารสารวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี มหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
References
Masscheleyn, P.H., Delaune, R.D. and Patrick, W.H. 1991. Effect of redox potential and pH on arsenic speciation and solubility in a contaminated soil. Environmental Science & Technology. 25(8): 1414-1419.
Lee, K.S. and et al. 2015. The fate and factors determining arsenic mobility of arsenic in soil-A review. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer. 48(2): 73-80.
Sun, W. and et al. 2009. Arsenite and ferrous iron oxidation linked to chemolithotrophic denitrification for the immobilization of arsenic in anoxic environments. Environmental Science & Technology. 43(17): 6585-6591.
Lin, T.F. and Wu, J.K. 2001. Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate within activated alumina grains: Equilibrium and kinetics. Water Research. 35(8): 2049-2057.
Bhattacharya, S. and et al. 2021. Arsenic uptake and bioaccumulation in plants: A review on remediation and socio-economic perspective in Southeast Asia. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management. 15: 100430.
Dixit, S. and Hering, J.G. 2003. Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: Implications for arsenic mobility. Environmental Science & Technology. 37(18): 4182-4189.
Shaibur, M.R., Adjadeh, T.A., and Kawai, S. 2013. Effect of phosphorus on the concentrations of arsenic, iron and some other elements in barley grown hydroponically. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 13(1): 87-98.
Bednar, A.J. and et al. 2005. Effects of iron on arsenic speciation and redox chemistry in acid mine water. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 85(2): 55-62.
Azam, M.S., Shafiquzzaman, M. and Nakajima, J. 2010. Effect of calcium and magnesium addition on arsenic leaching from paddy field soil by Bangladesh. Journal of Water and Environment Technology. 8(4): 329-338.
Smith, E., Naidu, R. and Alston, A.M. 2002. Chemistry of inorganic arsenic in soils II. Effect of phosphorus, sodium, and calcium on arsenic sorption. Journal of Environmental Quality. 31(2): 557-563.
Masue, Y., Loeppert, R.H. and Kramer, T.A. 2007. Arsenate and arsenite adsorption and desorption behavior on coprecipitated aluminum: iron hydroxides. Environmental Science & Technology. 41(3): 837-842.
Giles, D.E. and et al. 2011. Iron and aluminium based adsorption strategies for removing arsenic from water. Journal of Environmental Management. 92(12): 3011-3022.
Abbas, G. and et al. 2018. Arsenic uptake, toxicity, detoxification, and speciation in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15(1): 59.
Nateewattana, J. and et al. 2018. Arsenic remediation in speciation of arsenite As(III) and arsenate As(V) in submerged soil by Typha angustifolia L. KKU Science Journal. 46(3): 506-516. (in Thai)
John, R., Estefan, G. and Rashid, A. 2001. Soil and Plant Analysis Laboratory Manual. 2nd edition. Beirut: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas.
Stevens, J. 1992. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. 2nd edition. Mahwah: Lawrance Erlbaum Associate, Inc.
Marcoulides, K.M. and Raykov, T. 2019. Evaluation of variance inflation factors in regression models using latent variable modeling methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 79(5): 874-882.
Gersztyn, L., Karczewska, A. and Galka, B. 2013. Influence of pH on the solubility of arsenic in heavily contaminated soils. Environmental Protection and Natural Resources. 3(5): 7-11.
Nateewattana, N. and et al. 2018. Arsenic phytoremediation of submerged soil using Canna glauca (L.). Journal of Science and Technology, Ubon Ratchathani University. 21(1): 90-100. (in Thai)
Aksorn, E. and Visoottiviseth, P. 2004. Selection of suitable emergent plants for removal of arsenic from arsenic contaminated water. ScienceAsia. 30: 105-113.
Phuekvilai, P., Sirichamorn, Y. and Yookongkaew, N. 2017. Arsenic accumulation of dominant herbaceous plants growing around gold mine areas. Thai Science and Technology Journal. 26(6): 953-967. (in Thai)
Niero, L. 2013. Assessment of As Contaminated Soil Stabilized with Iron Amendments by Laboratory and Field Experiments. M.Sc. Thesis, Universita’ Degli Studi Di Padova.
Magalhaes, M.C.F. 2002. Arsenic. An environmental problem limited by solubility. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 74(10): 1843-1850.
Soil Science Department, Kasetsart University. 2005. Introduction to Soil Science. 10th edition. Bangkok: Kasetsart University Press. (in Thai)
Ghosh, B. and et al. 2003. Removal of arsenic from water by coagulation treatment using iron and magnesium salt. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology. 10: 87-95.
Roman-Ross, G. and et al. 2006. Arsenite sorption and co-precipitation with calcite. Chemical Geology. 233: 328-336.
Bothe, J.V. and Brown, P.W. 1991. Arsenic immobilization by calcium arsenate formation. Environmental Science & Technology. 33(21): 3806-3811.
Strawn, D.G. 2018. Review of interactions between phosphorus and arsenic in soils from four case studies. Geochemical Transactions. 19: 10.
Johanna, L. 2017. Phosphorus in the Sediment of Agricultural Constructed Wetlands. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Helsinki.
