การวัดการกระจายในงานวิจัยทางชีววิทยา : ค่าเบี่ยงเบนมาตรฐาน ความคลาดเคลื่อนมาตรฐาน และสัมประสิทธิ์การแปรผัน

Main Article Content

พิพัฒน์ สมภาร

Abstract

Abstract


If researchers repeatedly observe and quantify a particular biological phenomenon, the measurements will rarely be identical. Part of the variability is due to an inherent variation in biological material being measured. One characteristic of a set of observations measured on a quantitative variable is known as measures of dispersion. There are a number of measures of dispersion of the data, each of which has different attributes. When reporting data in biological research papers, authors often use descriptive statistical methods to describe their study sample.  Authors often use the standard deviation (SD) and standard error (SE) to describe the variability of their sample. However, the two are frequently confused with the consequence that the wrong measure is used to describe the variability of interest; may lead to a misinterpretation of the data. Whereas the SD is a measure of the scatter of the observations, the SE is a measure of the precision of the sample mean as an estimate of the population mean. In addition to the SD and SE, coefficient of variation (CV) is also described in this paper. 


Keywords: biology; statistic; dispersion; standard deviation; standard error

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
วิทยาศาสตร์ชีวภาพ
Author Biography

พิพัฒน์ สมภาร

สาขาวิชาเทคโนโลยีการเกษตร คณะวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์ ศูนย์รังสิต ตำบลคลองหนึ่ง อำเภอคลองหลวง จังหวัดปทุมธานี 1212

References

[1] Samuels, M.L., Witmer, J.A. and Schaffner, A.A., 2012, Statistics for the Life Sciences, 4th Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 654 p.
[2] Petrie, A. and Watson, P., 1999, Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Science, Alden Press, Oxford, 243 p.
[3] Morris, T.R., 1999, Experimental Design and Analysis in Animal Science, Biddles, Ltd., Guildford, 208 p.
[4] Aaron, D.K. and Hays, V.W., 2004, How many pig? Statistical power considerations in swine nutrition experiments, J. Anim. Sci. 82 (E. Suppl.): E245-E254.
[5] Mead, R., Curnow, R.N. and Hasted, A.M., 1993, Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology, Chapman & Hall, London, 415 p.
[6] Gotelli, N.J. and Ellison, A.M., 2013, A Primer of Ecological Statistics. 2nd Ed., Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, 614 p.
[7] Olsen, C.H., 2003, Review of the use of statistics in Infection and Immunity, Infect. Immun. 71: 6689-6692.
[8] Curran-Everett, D. and Benos, D.J., 2004, Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society, Am. J .Physiol. Cell Physiol. 287: C243-C245.
[9] Nagele, P., 2001. Misuse of standard error of the mean (SEM) when reporting variability of a sample: A critical evaluation of four anaesthesia journals, Br. J. Anaes. 90: 514-516.
[10] Schenker, N. and Gentleman, J., 2001, On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confi-dence intervals, Am. Stat. 55 : 182-186.
[11] Cumming, Fidler, G.F. and Vaux, D.L., 2007, Error bars in experimental biology, J. Cell Biol. 177: 7-11.
[12] พิพัฒน์ สมภาร, นภดล ทองย้อย และนวิญญา พิมพา, 2560, อิทธิพลของการเพิ่มพูนสภาพแวดล้อมต่อพฤติกรรมของลูกสุกรหลังหย่านม, ว. วิทย. เกษตร 48(2)(พิเศษ): 248-255.