การวิเคราะห์เปรียบเทียบความคุ้มค่าทางเศรษฐศาสตร์ของระบบผลิตไฟฟ้าพลังงานแสงอาทิตย์บนหลังคาระหว่างการเป็นเจ้าของกับการทำสัญญาซื้อขายไฟฟ้าจากเอกชน กรณีศึกษา มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์ ศูนย์รังสิต

Main Article Content

thanapol tantisattayakul

Abstract

This research analyzed and compared economic feasibility of installation options of solar rooftop systems between being system owner and private power purchase agreement (Private PPA) by using Thammasat University, Rangsit Centre as a case study. The indicators used were levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and net present value (NPV). In addition, the risk assessment of the project was performed by sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis considering the variables (1) system cost (2) the rate of increase in the electricity tariff and (3) the amount of electricity that can be produced from the solar rooftop. The results showed that under the base case assumption, the system owner option was more cost effective with lower LCOE and higher NPV than Private PPA option. The sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis results showed that the system owner option tended to be more attractive than the private PPA option under the situations of low system costs and high escalation rates of electricity tariff. On the other hand, under situations of high system costs and low escalation rates of electricity tariff, the private PPA will likely be more attractive than the system owner option. Moreover, if the amount of electricity produced from the solar rooftop reduces, the chance that the private PPA option will be more attractive. In addition, while the system owner option may have negative NPV in some situation, the advantage of the private PPA option is that the NPV will always be positive since there is no investment and expenses. The results of this study will be useful for decision makers to select the suitable installation option for themselves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
วิศวกรรมศาสตร์และสถาปัตยกรรมศาสตร์
Author Biography

thanapol tantisattayakul

สาขาวิชาสาขาเทคโนโลยีเพื่อการพัฒนายั่งยืน คณะวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์ ศูนย์รังสิต ตำบลคลองหนึ่ง อำเภอคลองหลวง จังหวัดปทุมธานี 12120

References

[1] Development and Efficiency (DEDE), Ministry of Energy, Project to Improve the Solar Potential Map from Satellite Images for Thailand 2017, Available Source: https://www.dede.go.th/ewt_news.php?nid=47736, October 1, 2018. (in Thai)
[2] Tantisattayakul, T., 2015, An assessment of financial promotion measures for residential solar photovoltaic rooftop system in Thailand, Thai Sci. Technol. J. 23(4): 605-621. (in Thai)
[3] Tantisattayakul, T. and Kanchanapiya, P., 2017, Financial measures for promoting residential rooftop photovoltaics under a feed-in tariff framework in Thailand, Energy Policy 109: 260-269.
[4] Panprayun, G., 2017, 8 kWp rooftop PV system and feasibility of system expansion, J. Profess. Routine Res. 4: 76-86. (in Thai)
[5] Suwanasang, N. and Tongsopit, S., 2015, An assessment of the technical and economic potential of rooftop solar systems on Chulalongkorn University’s buildings, J. Energy Res. 12(2): 59-74. (in Thai)
[6] Tantisattayakul, T., Rassameethamma chote, P. and Auisakul, M., 2017, Energy, environmental and economic assessment of solar rooftop systems on buildings of Thammasat University, Rangsit Centre, Thai Sci. Technol. J. 25(6): 1083-1099. (in Thai)
[7] Piriyasatta, P., 2016, Using photovoltaic system on the faculty of Architecture’s building rooftop in Khon Kaen University for energy conservation, Built Environ. Inquiry J. Faculty Architect. Khon Kaen Univ. 15(1): 183-200. (in Thai)
[8] Pichitkunchorn, W. and Chayakulkheeree, K., 2018, Design and economic analysis of solar rooftop electric system on the building of Post Engineering Department, Eng. J. Res. Develop. 29(1): 25-36. (in Thai)
[9] Potisat, T., Tongsopit, S., Aksornkij, A. and Moungchareon, S., 2017, To buy the system or to buy the service: The emergence of a solar service model in Thailand, Renew. Energy Focus 21: 1-10.
[10] International Renewable Energy Agency (IREA), 2015, Renewable power generation costs in 2014, IRENA, p. 164
[11] Solarpraxis, A.G., 2011, Inverter and PV System Technology Industry Guide 2011, RENI-Renewable Insight Energy Industry Guides, p. 98.
[12] Limmanee, A., Udomdachanut, N., Songtrai, S., Kaewniyompanit, S., Sato, Y., Nakaishi, M., Kittisontirak, S., Sriprapha, K. and Sakamoto, Y., 2016, Field performance and degradation rates of different types of photovoltaic modules: A case study in Thailand, J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 89: 12-17.
[13] Jordan, D.C., Smith, R.M., Osterwald, C.R., Gelak, E. and Kurtz, S.R., 2011, Outdoor PV Degradation Comparison, NREL/CP-5200-47704, p. 7.
[14] Jordan, D.C. and Kurtz, S.R., 2012, Photovoltaic Degradation Rates: An Analytical Review, NREL/JA-5200-51664, p. 30
[15] Bank of Thailand, Macroeconomic Indica tors, Available Source: https://www2.bot.or.th/statistics/ReportPage.aspx?ReportID=409, October 1, 2018. (in Thai)
[16] Bank of Thailand, Loan Interest Rate, Available Source: https://www.bot.or.th/thai/statistics/financialmarkets/interestrate/_layouts/application/interest_rate/in_rate.aspx, October 1, 2018.