School garden programs supporting sustainable agricultural intensification through knowledge transfer and family engagement
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Objective: This study explores the role of a school garden program in facilitating the transfer of information on Sustainable Agricultural Intensification (SAI) from students to their families. The study investigates three key objectives: (1) assessing whether students shared SAI-related knowledge with their families and explore how parental demographic were related to receiving knowledge from their child, (2) exploring the types of SAI technologies parents reported hearing from their child and the benefits they expected after receiving that knowledge, and (3) analyzing the factors that influence parent’s willingness to apply SAI at home.
Methodology: This research was conducted in Siem Reap province, Cambodia, and involved 120 families. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews in June 2024. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, independent t-tests, and logistic regression models.
Main Results: The results show that 70% of parents received SAI-related information from their child. Parents’ gender (χ2 = 9.30, P= 0.002), occupation (χ2 = 5.09, P = 0.024), and farming experiences (t = 2.72, P = 0.007) were significantly associated with their child sharing knowledge with them. Among the families who received information, most parents recognized specific SAI techniques and perceived benefits such as increased crop yield, reduced chemical use, and improved environmental outcomes. Logistic regression analysis in the full model shows that parent’s occupation (β = 6.584, P < 0.001), perceived benefits of SAI (β = 3.969, P < 0.001), and social influence from peers and community (β = 1.888, P < 0.05) were significant predictors of parent’s willingness to apply SAI practices at home.
Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential of school garden programs to promote SAI through the school context by training students, increasing their knowledge, and empowering them to act as a knowledge bridge to their families. This study also shows the importance of reinforcing the perceived benefits of SAI and leveraging social networks to enhance adoption at the household level.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Acharya, A.S., A. Prakash, P. Saxena and A. Nigam. 2013. Sampling: Why and how of it?. Indian J. Med. Spec. 4(2): 330–333.
Acharya, K., C.B. Budhathoki and M. Acharya. 2022. Science learning from the school garden through participatory action research in Nepal. Qual. Rep. 27(6): 1623–1634. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.4561.
Calberry, V., I.E. Lofgren and L.F. Pivarnik. 2016. Food safety and school garden pilot program for elementary school students. Food Prot. Trends. 36(5): 362–371.
Calub, B.M., L.S. Africa, B.M. Burgos, H.M. Custodio, S. Chiang, A.G.C. Vallez, E.I.N.E. Galang and M.K.R. Punto. 2019. The School-Plus-Home Gardens Project in the Philippines: A participatory and inclusive model for sustainable development. SEARCA Policy Paper 2019. Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA). Laguna, Philippines.
Chhinh, N., S. Sok, V. Sou and P. Nguonphan. 2022. Local engagement in the agricultural cooperatives (ACs) operation in Cambodia. Sustainability. 14(24): 16515. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416515.
Dahal, S., B. Dangi, R.K. Dangi, P. Bista, A. Bhandari, P. Adhikari and M. Bhattarai. 2023. Determinants of adoption of multiple sustainable agriculture practices among mandarin producing farmers in Salyan district of Karnali province, Nepal. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. Res. 7(4): em0230. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/13440.
Etikan, I. and K. Bala. 2017. Sampling and sampling methods. Biom. Biostat. Int. J. 5(6): 215‒217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149.
Gandasari, D., D.P. Lubis and D. Dwidienawati. 2020. Socialization on agricultural work from farmer parents to their children: A case study. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. 24(2): 2022‒2027. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I2/PR200503.
Gill, T., V. Ricciardi, R. Bates and D. James. 2017. Capacity development in agricultural education and training in Cambodia: A SWOT analysis. J. Int. Agric. Ext. Educ. 24(1): 34–50. https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2017.24105.
Hamazakaza, P., G. Kabwe, E. Kuntashula, A. Egeru and R. Asiimwe. 2022. Adoption of sustainable agriculture intensification in maize-based farming systems of Katete district in Zambia. Land. 11(6): 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060880.
Hancock, J., D. Gray and L. Colucci-Gray. 2023. A view from the garden: Interrupting politics of attainment and re-orienting education towards sustainable futures. Eur. Educ. Res. J. 24(1): 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041231189967.
Holloway, T.P., L. Dalton, R. Hughes, S. Jayasinghe, K.A.E. Patterson, S. Murray, R. Soward, N.M. Byrne, A.P. Hills and K.D.K. Ahuja. 2023. School gardening and health and well-being of school-aged children: A realist synthesis. Nutrients. 15(5): 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051190.
Israel, G.D. 1992. Determining Sample Size. University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Issaka, Y.B., S.A. Donkoh and G. Kranjac-Berisavljevic. 2024. Psycho-social factors influencing the adoption of sustainable intensification practices by smallholder rice farmers in Northern Ghana. Cogent Food Agric. 10(1): 2345434. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2345434.
Knapp, M.B., M.T. Hall, A.R. Mundorf, K.L. Partridge and C.C. Johnson. 2019. Perceptions of school-based kitchen garden programs in low-income, African American communities. Health Promot. Pract. 20(5): 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839918782157.
Kolb, D.A., R.E. Boyatzis and C. Mainemelis. 2014. Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions, pp. 227–247. In: R.J. Sternberg and L.F. Zhang, (Eds.), Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles. Routledge, New York, USA.
Li, J., X. Zhang, F. Ye, X. Cheng and L. Yu. 2024. Factors affecting parental role adaptation in parents of preterm infants after discharge: A cross-sectional study. Front. Psychol. 15: 1396042. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1396042.
Losasso, C., V. Cappa, V. Cibin, C. Mantovani, N. Costa, E. Faccio, I. Andrighetto and A. Ricci. 2014. Food safety and hygiene lessons in the primary school: Implications for risk-reduction behaviors. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 11(1): 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2013.1598.
MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries). 2015. Agricultural Extension Policy in Cambodia. Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Maliotou, M.N. and G. Liarakou. 2026. School gardening through the perspective of the Whole School Approach. Education. 3–13. 54(2): 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2313673.
Mezirow, J. 1994. Understanding transformation theory. Adult Educ. Q. 44(4): 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369404400403.
Pekarcik, G., D. Ader, T. Gill and J. Richards. 2023. Assessing the impact of parental involvement on scaling agricultural technologies from school garden to home farm in Cambodia. J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev. 12(3): 177–192. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2023.123.006.
Peng, C.Y.J., K.L. Lee and G.M. Ingersoll. 2002. An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. J. Educ. Res. 96(1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209598786.
Prasad, P.V.V. 2022. Sustainable agricultural intensification and climate smart agricultural practices for improved food and climate security. J. Rice Res. 15(Special Issue): 93–96. https://doi.org/10.58297/LAXG1026.
Sharp, E., S. Tsang and V. Egli. 2024. Children’s food gardening: Valuing experiential, intergenerational and multi-cultural learning. Kōtuitui: NZ J. Soc. Sci. Online. 20(4): 738-762. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2024.2425427.
Short-Meyerson, K., S. Sandrin and C. Edwards. 2016. Gender influences on parent-child science problem-solving behaviors. J. Res. Child. Educ. 30(3): 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2016.1178194.
Shrestha, J., S. Subedi, K.P. Timsina, S. Subedi, M. Pandey, A. Shrestha, S. Shrestha and M.A. Hossain. 2021. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: An approach for making agriculture greener and productive. J. Nepal Agric. Res. Counc. 7(1): 133–150. https://doi.org/10.3126/jnarc.v7i1.36937.
Sobel, D. 2004. Place-Based Education: Connecting Classrooms and Communities. Orion Society, Massachusetts, USA.
Teklewold, H., M. Kassie and B. Shiferaw. 2013. Adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices in rural Ethiopia. J. Agric. Econ. 64(3): 597–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12011.
Tran, T.A., B.R. Cook and V. Touch. 2025. Agricultural extension institutions in rural Cambodia: Unpacking extension agent-farmer relations and interactions. J. Rural Stud. 117: 103671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103671.
Wells, N.M., L.E. Todd, C.R. Henderson Jr., B.M. Myers, K. Barale, B. Gaolach, G. Ferenz, M. Aitken, L. Hendrix, C. Taylor and J.L. Wilkins. 2022. The effects of school gardens on fruit and vegetable consumption at school: A randomized controlled trial with low-income elementary schools in four U.S. states. Prev. Med. Rep. 31: 102053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102053.
Withanage, D.P. and B.W.R. Damayanthi. 2019. Factors influencing the youths' interest in agricultural entrepreneurship in Sri Lanka. Developing Country Studies. 9(12): 32–40. https://doi.org/10.7176/DCS/9-12-05.
Yadav, A. and J. Ali. 2016. Parents' perception towards inclusion of agriculture in school curriculum in rural India. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 22(3): 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.997258.
Zeman, J., C. Perry-Parrish and M. Cassano. 2010. Parent-child discussions of anger and sadness: The importance of parent and child gender during middle childhood. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 2010(128): 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.269.