Assessment of Composition and Yield Quality Relationship of Mulberry Fruit OP Breeding Lines

Main Article Content

Wattawatit Chaisaentao
Chontira Sangsiri
Nednapa Insalud
Tanaporn Kajonphol

Abstract

     The purpose of this research was to assess the relationship between various characteristics of six selected open pollinated (op) mulberry lines and Chiangmai variety hereafter referred as control. The results showed that the variety 1037 and 1102 gave a higher branch length (312.60 and 295.56 cm.), total yield (2,127.00 and 1,536.30 g.), TSS/TA (47.13 and 47.48) total phenolic content (1,243.60 and 1,214.00 mg GAE/100g.) than the control. Total Soluble Solid (TSS) varied from 13.67-20.83 °Brix. TSS/TA showed ranged 21.27-47.48. The correlation among 14 characters revealed the significantly positive correlations to total yields per plant were observed for fruit weight (0.73), fruit width (0.59) and fruit length (0.61). Branches per plant, fruit weight, fruit width, fruit length and total yield were positively correlated with total soluble solid (TSS) (0.87, 0.82, 0.87, 0.88 and 0.62). Moreover, 1037 and 1102 had a high of number yield per plant and TSS/TA which revealed outstanding performance for the market of fresh mulberry consumption. This study can be used to select and develop the varieties that are suitable for Sakon Nakhon province planting areas.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chaisaentao, W. ., Sangsiri, C. ., Insalud, N. ., & Kajonphol, T. . (2023). Assessment of Composition and Yield Quality Relationship of Mulberry Fruit OP Breeding Lines. Maejo Journal of Agricultural Production, 5(2), 56–66. retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/japmju/article/view/260182
Section
Research Article

References

ศูนย์หม่อนไหมเฉลิมพระเกียรติฯ เชียงใหม่. 2550. หม่อนพันธุ์แนะนำ: หม่อนผลสดพันธุ์เชียงใหม่. แหล่งข้อมูล http://chiangmaisilk.blogspot.com/2007/07/blog-post_2391.html (2 สิงหาคม 2565).

A.O.A.C. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington DC.

Ebrahimi, A., A. Poursalavati, M.M. Esboei, S.R. Monfared, M. Sahebi, M.R. Amerian and H.H. Khoshro. 2021. Population and individual multivariate analysis of white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra) and black (Morus nigra) mulberry genotypes: applications for breeding, conservation and development. Euphytica. 217: 1-27.

Ercisli, S. and E. Orhan. 2007. Chemical composition of white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra) and black (Morus nigra) mulberry fruits. Food chem. 103(4): 1380-1384.

Gundogdu, M., F. Muradoglu, R.G. Sensoy and H. Yilmaz. 2011. Determination of fruit chemical properties of Morus nigra L., Morus alba L. and Morus rubra L. by HPLC. Sci. Hortic. 132: 37-41.

Han, S.Y. 2007. The ecological value of mulberry and its ecological cultivation models for planting mulberry from eastern to western areas in Guizhou. Guizhou Agric. Sci. 35(5): 140-142.

Hashemi, S. and A. Khadiv. 2020. Morphological and pomological characteristics of white mulberry (Morus alba L.) accessions. Sci. Hortic. 259: 1-9.

Hosseini, A.S., M. Akramian, A. Khadivi and H. Salehi-Arjmand. 2018. Phenotypic and chemical variation of black mulberry (Morus nigra) genotypes. Biol. Ind. Crop. Prod. 117: 260-271.

Huang, F. and D. Wang. 2012. The introduction to mulberry to ecological restoration. North Sericulture. 33(4): 52-54.

Iqbal, S., U. Younas, K.W. Chan, R.A. Sarfraz and M.K. Uddin. 2012. Proximate composition and antioxidant potential of leaves from three varieties of Mulberry (Morus sp.): a comparative study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13(6): 6651-6664.

Jeszka-Skowron, M., E. Flaczyk, J. Jeszka, Z. Krejpcio, E. Król and M.S. Buchowski. 2014. Mulberry leaf extract intake reduces hyperglycaemia in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats fed high-fat diet. J. Funct. Foods. 8: 9-17.

Jiang, Y. and W.J. Nei. 2015. Chemical properties in fruits of mulberry species from the Xinjiang province of China. Food Chem. 174: 460-466.

Johnson, R. and P. Kuby. 2004. Elementary Statistics, Thomson Learning, Inc., USA.

Juan, C., K. Jianquan, T. Junni, C. Zijian and L. Ji. 2012. The profile in polyphenols and volatile compounds in alcoholic beverages from different cultivars of mulberry. J. Food Sci. 77(4). 430-436.

Krishna, H., D. Singh, R.S. Singh, L. Kumar and B.D. Sharma. 2020. Morphological and antioxidant characteristics of mulberry (Morus spp.). J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 19: 136-145.

Nonthakod, S., P. Wiwacharn, C. Sangsiri and T. Kajonphol. 2019. Correlation and path coefficient for economic traits of fruit mulberry (Morus spp.) based on criteria mulberry selection. Appl. Mech. Mater. 891: 66-70.

Peris, N.W., K.M. Gacheri, M.M. Theophillus and N. Lucas. 2014. Morphological characterization of mulberry (Morus spp.) accessions grown in Kenya. Sustain. Agric. Res. 3(1): 10-17.

Rahman, S.M. and S.S. Islam. 2020. Genetic variability and correlation studies of mulberry (Morus alba L.) genotypes in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Bot. 49(3): 685-691.

Srivastava, S., R. Kapoor, A. Thathola and R.P. Srivastava. 2003. Mulberry (Morus alba) leaves as human food: a new dimension of sericulture. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 54(6). 411-416.

Thriveni, M.C., R. Mondal, G. Thanavendan, G. Ravikumar and B.T. Sreenivasa. 2021. Characterization of mulberry genetic resources for multiple traits. IJAB. 1(2): 8-15.

Vijayan, K. 2010. The emerging role of genomic tools in mulberry (Morus) genetic improvement. Tree Genet. Genomes. 6(4): 613-625.

Wang, Y., L. Xiang, C. Wang, C. Tang and X. He. 2013. Antidiabetic and antioxidant effects and phytochemicals of mulberry fruit (Morus alba L.) polyphenol enhanced extract. PloS one. 8(7): 1-10.

Wu, C.H., S.C. Chen, T.T. Ou, C.C. Chyau, Y.C. Chang and C.J. Wang. 2013. Mulberry leaf polyphenol extracts reduced hepatic lipid accumulation involving regulation of adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase and lipogenic enzymes. J. Funct. Foods. 5(4). 1620-1632.

Yilmaz, K.U., Y. Zengin, S. Ercisli, M.N. Demirtas, T. Kan and A.R. Nazli. 2012. Morphological diversity on fruit characteristics among some selected mulberry genotypes from Turkey. J. Animal Plant Sci. 22(1): 211-214.