Evaluation of Quick Assessment Method for Mechanical Damage in Soybean Seed

Main Article Content

Papassorn Wattanakulpakin
Kantima Thongsri
Paveena Ruk-Ak

Abstract

Mechanical damage plays an important role in seed quality. According to high protein and oil components, soybean seed becomes fragile during harvesting and processing, resulting in reduced seed yield and quality. Mechanical damage to the seed is monitored after threshing and processing to reduce loss of quantity and quality. Although the Indoxyl acetate (IDA) test is recommended for mechanical soybean seed damage detection, it is complicated, expensive, and difficult to apply in the field. Therefore, quick assays were conducted on 15 soybean (cv. DOA Chiangmai 60) seed lots to detect mechanical damage to soybean seed, namely fast green (FG), ferric chloride (FC), and sodium hypochlorite (SDH), and the results were then compared with the IDA method. The germination and vigor—as measured by accelerated aging tests—ranged from 71% to 90% and 46% to 86%, respectively. The average mechanical damage to 15 seed lots tested by IDA equated to 7.9%, significantly different from FG (11.3%), FC (11.2%), and SDH (11.6%) methods determined by the paired t-test. The correlation coefficient (r) and linear regression (R2) among mechanical damage methods were analyzed, with the greatest significance found between IDA and SDH. Although the mechanical damage determined by SDH was significantly higher than IDA, this method revealed the closest relationship with IDA and exhibited the moderate negative correlation with germination, as well as being the easiest, cheapest, and most feasible for soybean seed cv. DOA Chiangmai 60 application in the field compared to other methods.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Agrawal, R.L. 1995. Seed Technology. 2nd ed. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi. 842 p.

Carbonell S.A.M. and F.C. Krzyzanowsk. 1995. The pendulum test for screening soybean genotypes for seed resistant to mechanical damage. Seed Science Technology 23(2): 331 - 339.

Carvalho, T.C. and A.D.L.C. Novembre. 2013. Identification of soybean seed coat damage. Applied Research and Agrotechnology 6(1): 85 - 90.

Chowdhury, M.H. and W.F. Buchele. 1976. Colorimetric determination of grain damage. Transactions of the ASAE 19(5): 807 - 808.

De Barro, J. 2008. Understanding and managing the causes of abnormal seedlings in lucerne. RIRDC publication no. 08/023. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Barton. 4 p.

El-Abady, M.I., A.A.M. Ek-Emam, S.E. Seadh and F.I. Yousof. 2012. Soybean seed quality as affected by cultivars, threshing methods and storage periods. Research Journal of Seed Science 5(4): 115 - 125.

Gagare, K.C., R.W. Bharud, V.R. Shelar, and A.P. Karjule. 2014. Detection of mechanical damage to soybean seed surface using ferric chloride test. Agricultural Science Digest 34(4): 289 - 292.

Gagre, K.C., R.W. Bharud and A.P. Karjule. 2014. Study of mechanical damage of soybean due to different threshing and processing methods by using sodium hypochlorite test. American-Eurasian Journal Agricultural & Environmental Sciences 14(6): 570 - 574.

International Seed Testing Association. 2022. International rules for seed testing, Bassersdorf. 314 p.

Marcos Filho, J., S.M. Cícero and W.R. Silva. 1987. Seeds Quality Evaluation. FEALQ, Piracicaba. 230 p.

Maryam, D. and B. Oskouie. 2011. Study the effect of mechanical damage at processing on soybean seed germination and vigor. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 6(7): 60 - 64.

Ministry of Commerce. 2024. Soybean. (Online). Available: https://regional.moc.go.th/th/file/get/file/202404175fbc35f6fc4ca837e3291fd3560e9a7b085305.pdf. (November 20, 2024). (in Thai)

Parde, S.R., R.T. Kausal, D.S. Jayas and N.D.G. White. 2002. Mechanical damage to soybean seed during processing. Journal of Stored Products Research 38(4): 385 - 394.

Paulsen, M.R. and W.R. Nave. 1979. Improved indoxyl acetate test for detecting soybean seed coat damage. Transactions of the ASAE 22(6): 1475 - 1479.

VanUtrecht, D., C.J. Bern and I.H. Rukunudin, 2000. Soybean mechanical damage detection. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 16(2): 137 - 141.

Vearasilpa, S., P. Somchai, K. Nattasak, Th. Sa-nguansak, S. Sangitwa and P. Elke. 2001. Assessment of post harvest soybean seed quality loss. In: Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, Institute for Agricultural Chemistry, Georg - August University, Göttingen.

Zonta, J.B., E.F. Araújo, R.F. Araújo, F.M.G. Zonta and M.S. Reis. 2011. Characterization of mechanical damage in coffee seeds by the LERCAFÉ test. IDESIA (Chile) 29(3): 33 - 38.