The Change in Photosynthetic Parameters of Sugarcane Promising Clones under Drought Stress
Main Article Content
Abstract
Physiological change in plants is one of the responding processes in plants under drought stress, including the SCMR or photosynthetic parameters. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in photosynthetic parameters in sugarcane under drought stress and after rehydration. The experimental design was split plot design in RCB with 3 replications, main plots were (1) well-watered based on plant requirement, and (2) restrict-watered for 14 days at 96-109 days after plantation (tillering period), and sub plots were sugarcane varieties: (1) KK11-516, (2) KK14-030, (3) KK14-136, (4) LK92-11, and (5) KK3. This experiment was carried out in 2022 at Khon Kaen Field Crops Research Center, Mueang district, Khon Kaen Province. The results showed that the SCMR of sugarcanes decreased under drought condition that compared to sugarcane varieties, it was obtained that the highest SCMR was KK14-136 as 40.14 SPAD-unit at 139 days after plantation (30 days after rehydration), as well as the capacities of photosynthetic parameters of sugarcane decreased under drought condition; regardless, the stomatal conductance (gs) and the transpiration rate (E) of KK14-030 were similar to well-watered after re-watering for 1 day as 0.07 and 2.16 mmol m-2s-1, respectively. The results of this study can be used as a guideline for the study of photosynthetic parameters of sugarcane or to select new sugarcane varieties in Thailand going forward.
Article Details
References
Aguilera, C., Stirling, C. M., & Long, S. P. (2002). Genotypic variation within Zea mays for susceptibility to and rate of recovery from chill-induced photoinhibition of photosynthesis. Physiologia Plantarum, 106(4), 429-436. doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.106411.x
Aidar, S. T., Meirelles, S. T., Oliveira, R. F., Chaves, A. R. M., & Fernandes-Júnior, P. I. (2014). Photosynthetic response of poikilochlorophyllous desiccation-tolerant Pleurostima purpurea (Velloziaceae) to dehydration and rehydration. Photosynthetica, 52(1), 124-133. doi:10.1007/s11099-014-0014-0
Buakom, W., KrachaI P., Gonkhamdee, S., Songsri, P., & Jongrungklang, N. (2020). Responses of rooting and physiological characteristics of sugarcanes grown under mimic drought stress as low water potential at early stage. Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal, 48(6), 1442-1457. doi:10.14456/kaj.2020.127
Chinnasaen, T., Cheakittisak, R., Jungpol, P., Chanachai, S., & Pakdeethai, C. (2021). Studies on agronomic traits and cane yield of sugarcane promising clones under irrigated and rain-fed conditions. Prawarun Agricultural Journal, 18(1), 17-26. doi:10.14456/paj.2021.2 (in Thai)
Da Graca, J. P., Rodrigues, F. A., Farias, J. R. B., De Oliveira, M. C. N., Hoffmann-Campo, C. B., & Zingaretti, S. M. (2010). Physiological parameters in sugarcane cultivars submitted to water deficit. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 22(3), 189-197. doi: 10.1590/S1677-04202010000300006
Da Silva, P. P., Soares, L., Da Costa, J. G., Da Silva Viana, L., De Andrade, J. C. F., Goncalves, E. R., Dos Santos, J. M., De Souza Barbosa, G. V., Nascimento, V. X., Todaro, A. R., Riffel, A., Grossi-de-Sa, M. F., Barbosa, M. H. P., Santana, A. E. G., & Neto, C. E. R. (2012). Path analysis for selection of drought tolerant sugarcane genotypes through physiological components. Industrial Crops and Products, 37(1), 11–19. doi : 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.11.015
Dongsansuk, A. (2017). Physiological responses of plants to environments. Khon Kaen: Faculty of Agriculture Khon Kaen University. (in Thai)
Doorenbos, J., & Kassem, A.H. (1979). Yield response to water. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-025675-7.50021-2
Field Crops Research Institute (FCRI). (1994). Field crops plantation. Bangkok: Field Crops Research Institute Department of Agriculture. (in Thai)
Jaiphong, T., Tominaga, J., Watanabe, K., Nakabaru, M., Takaragawa, H., Suwa, R., Ueno, M., & Kawamitsu, Y. (2016). Effects of duration and combination of drought and flood conditions on leaf photosynthesis, growth and sugar content in sugarcane. Plant Production Science, 19(3), 427–437. doi: 10.1080/1343943X.2016.1159520
Kasemsap, P. (2006). Biology 2. Bangkok: The project of science and mathematics book, the Promotion of Academic Olympiad and Development of Science Education Foundation. (in Thai)
Khonghintaisong, J., Songsri, P., & Jongrungklang, N. (2017). Growth and physiological patterns of sugarcane cultivars to mimic drought conditions in late rainy season system. Naresuan University Journal: Science and Technology, 25(2), 102-112.
Li, C., Nong, Q., Solanki, M. K., Liang, Q., Xie, J., Liu, X., Li, Y., Wang, W., Yang, L., & Li, Y. (2016). Differential expression profiles and pathways of genes in sugarcane leaf at elongation stage in response to drought stress. Scientific Reports. 6, 25698. doi: 10.1038/srep25698
Lisar, S. Y. S., Motafakkerazad, R., Hossain, M. M., & Rahman, I. M. M. (2012). Water stress in plants: Causes, effects and responses. Accessed February 2, 2023. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221921924_Water_Stress_in_Plants_Causes_Effects_and_Responses
Liu, Y. Y., Li, J., Liu, S. C., Yu, Q., Tong, X. J., Zhu, T. T., Gao, X. X., & Yu, L. X. (2020). Sugarcane leaf photosynthetic light responses and their difference between varieties under high temperature stress. Photosynthetica, 58(4), 1009-1018. doi: 10.32615/ps.2020.038
Namwongsa, J., Jongrungklang, N., & Songsri, P. (2019). Genotypic variation in root distribution changes and physiological responses of sugarcane induced by drought stress. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 51(4), 470-493.
Paisancharoen, K., Sansayawichai, T., Luanmanee, S., Thippayarugs, S., Chusorn, K, Chuenrung, J., & Pakdeethai, C. (2012). Water requirement and Kc values of Khon Kaen 3 sugarcane variety. Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal, 40 (Suppl. 3), 103-114. (in Thai)
Ramesh, P. (2000). Sugarcane breeding institute, coimbatore, India effect of different levels of drought during the formative phase on growth parameters and its relationship with dry matter accumulation in sugarcane. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 185(2), 83-89.
doi: 10.1046/j.1439-037x.2000.00404.x
Silva, M. De A., Jifon, J. L., Da Silva, J. A. G., & Sharma, V. (2007). Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 19(3), 193-201. doi: 10.1590/S1677-04202007000300003
Smith, M. (1992). CROPWAT- A computer program for irrigation planning and management. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Sun, J. K., Li, T., Xia, J. B., Tian, J. Y., Lu, Z. H., & Wang, R. T. (2011). Influence of salt stress on ecophysiological parameters of Periploca sepium Bunge. Plant, Soil and Environment, 57(4), 139–144. doi.org/10.17221/227/2010-PSE
Wang, J., Zhang, X., Han, Z., Feng, H., Wang, Y., Kang, J., Han, X., Wang, L., Wang, C., Li, H., & Ma, G. (2022). Analysis of physiological indicators associated with drought tolerance in wheat under drought and re-watering conditions. Antioxidants, 11(11), 2266. doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112266
Wolfe, D. W., Henderson, D. W., Hsaio, T. C., & Alvino, A. (1988). Interactive water and nitrogen effects on senescence of maize. II. Photosynthetic decline and longevity of individual leaves. Agronomy Journal, 80(6), 865-870.