Factors affecting the level of farmer participation in the agricultural extension services of cereal production in Bhutan

Main Article Content

Bhakta Bahadur Shangshon
Anan Polthanee
Patcharee Suriya

บทคัดย่อ

The purposes of this study were to assess the participation level of cereal farmers in agricultural extension services in Bhutan and to examine the factors affecting their participation. Data were collected by interviewing 251 farmers with a simple random sampling method from eight Gewogs (a group of villages), selected from four districts; consisting of the western, northern, southern, and eastern regions of Bhutan. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze socioeconomic characteristics and the participation levels in extension services of the farmers. In addition, Chi-square statistics were used to examine the factors influencing the farmers’ participation in extension services. The results determined that the participation in extension services of cereal farmers was generally low in Bhutan, with most accessing services through home visits, training, and mobile phone communication. Analysis of the relevant socioeconomic factors found that several factors influenced the participation of farmers in various extension service methods. In particular, the district where the farmers lived had a significant relationship with their participation in in-home visits, group discussions, and mobile phone communication. Age was also a significant factor in participation in in-home visits, mobile phone communication, and demonstrations. The total cultivated land owned by the farmers was significantly related to their participation in in-home visits, group discussions, and demonstrations. Gender was significantly associated with the farmers' participation in information sharing through TV or radio, while education level was directly related to their participation in study tours. Lastly, changes in production costs affected farmers' participation in training. Based on these findings, we suggest that agricultural extension service methods should be customized to meet the specific needs of farmers based on their socioeconomic contexts.

Article Details

บท
บทความวิจัย (research article)

References

Arene, C.J. 1994. Economic impact analysis of the training and visit system of agricultural extension on small-holder rice production in Nigeria. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture. 33(4): 393-403.

Baiyegunhi, L.J.S., Z.P. Majokweni, and S.R.D. Ferrer. 2019. Impact of outsourced agricultural extension program on smallholder farmers’ net farm income in Msinga, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Technology in Society. 57: 1-7.

Besley, T., and A. Case. 1993. Modeling technology adoption in developing countries. The American Economic Review. 83(2): 396-402.

Debnath, A., R. Saravanan, and J. Datta. 2016. Farmers’ satisfaction with the public agricultural extension services in Tripura State of North-East India. International Journal of Social Sciences. 5(2): 65-80.

Dendup, T. 2018. Agricultural transformation in Bhutan: from peasants to entrepreneurial farmers. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology. 23(3): 1-8.

Diaz, I.I., and D. Najjar. 2019. Gender and agricultural extension: why a gender focus matters. Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender). 4: 1-10. Available: https://doi.org/10.19268/JGAFS.422019.1. Accessed Dec. 8, 2021.

Dorji, N., and T. Gyeltshen. 2012. Characterisation of family poultry production in Haa and Mongar districts of Bhutan. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 24(9): 1-11. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236145720_Characterisation_of_family_poultry_production_in_Haa_and_Mongar_districts_of_Bhutan. Accessed Oct. 12, 2021.

Dwijanti, R., J. Sutrisno, B. Pujiasmanto, and E.S. Rahayu. 2018. Social economic factors and farmers' participation in the development of community forests in Kaligesing District Purworejo Regency. Academic Research International. 9(1): 201-214.

Fu, X., and S. Akter. 2016. The impact of mobile phone technology on agricultural extension services delivery: evidence from India. The Journal of Development Studies. 52(11): 1561-1576. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1146700. Accessed May. 20, 2022.

Gillwald, A., A. Milek, and C. Stork. 2010. Gender assessment of ICT access and usage in Africa. Towards Evidence-based ICT Policy and Regulation. 1(5): 1-38. Available: https://www.ictworks.org/sites/default/files/uploaded_pics/2009/Gender_Paper_Sept_2010.pdf. Accessed Feb. 15, 2022.

International Fund for Agricultural Development. 2015. Commercial Agriculture and Resilient Livelihoods Enhancement Programme (CARLEP). Available: https://www.carlep.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Project-Design-Report-Working-Paper.pdf. Accessed Mar. 12, 2022.

Issa, F.O., S.J. Auta, I.Y. Ilu, D.M. Kezi, and C.C. Ifeanyi-Obi. 2011. Analysis of farmers' participation in agricultural extension programmes in North-Western Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Rural Extension and Development. 4(March): 41-47.

Kassem, H.S., B.A. Alotaibi, M. Muddassir, and A. Herab. 2021. Factors influencing farmers’ satisfaction with the quality of agricultural extension services. Evaluation and Program Planning. 85: 1-10. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718921000070. Accessed Feb. 15, 2022.

Kilpatrick, S., and J. Williamson. 1996. Farmer participation in training. Rural Society. 6(4): 3-12.

Lotfy, A., and N. Adeeb. 2016. Measuring farmers’ satisfaction with the services of agricultural service providers in Minya and BeniSuef Governorates. Available: https://www.care.at/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/05/Satsifaction-surevy_English.pdf. Accessed Oct. 24, 2020.

Mengal, A. A., M.U. Mallah, Z.A. Mirani, and B.N. Siddiqui. 2012. An analysis of public and private agricultural extension services in Balochistan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research. 25(4): 307-317.

Ministry of Agriculture and Forests. 2017. RNR Agricultural Census Data. Ministry of Agriculture and Forests, Royal Government of Bhutan.

Ministry of Agriculture and Forests. 2020. Agriculture Statistics 2020. Ministry of Agriculture and Forests, Royal Government of Bhutan.

Ministry of Agriculture and Forests. 2021. Agriculture Survey Report. Ministry of Agriculture and Forests, Royal Government of Bhutan.

Nahayo, A., M.O. Omondi, X.H. Zhang, L.Q. Li, G.X. Pan, and S. Joseph. 2017. Factors influencing farmers' participation in crop intensification program in Rwanda. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 16(6): 1406-1416.

Noga, S.R., O.D. Kolawole, O.T. Thakadu, and G.S. Masunga. 2018. Wildlife officials only care about animals: farmers' perceptions of a Ministry-based extension delivery system in mitigating human-wildlife conflicts in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Journal of Rural Studies. 61: 216-226.

National Statistical Bureau. 2021. Statistical Year Book 2021. Thimphu, Bhutan: National Statistics Bureau of Bhutan.

Royal Government of Bhutan. 2013. 11th Five Year Plan (2013-2018). Thimphu, Bhutan: Gross National Happiness Commission, Royal Government of Bhutan.

Shalaby, M.Y., K.H. Al-Zahrani, M.B. Baig, G.S. Straquadine, and F. Aldosari. 2011. Threats and challenges to sustainable agriculture and rural development in Egypt: implications for agricultural extension. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences. 21(3): 581-588.

Sonam, T., and N. Martwanna. 2021. Smallholder dairy farmers’ group development in Bhutan: strengthening rural communities through group mobilization. Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal. 39(4): 413-428.

Suvedi, M., R. Ghimire, and M. Kaplowitz. 2017. Farmers’ participation in extension programs and technology adoption in rural Nepal: a logistic regression analysis. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 23(4): 351-371.

Wang, S.W., B. Manjur, J.G. Kim, and W.K. Lee. 2019. Assessing socio-economic impacts of agricultural subsidies: a case study from Bhutan. Sustainability. 11(12): 1-12.

World Bank. 2010. Gender and Governance in Rural Services. Available: https://www.elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978-0-8213-7658-4. Accessed May. 11, 2021.