Yield Comparison of Java Apple cv. ‘Thabthimchan’ in 4 Training Systems with High Density Planting in Two Bearing Years
Article Sidebar
Published:
Aug 17, 2020
Keywords:
Training system yield java apple Thabthimchan Syzygium samarangense
Main Article Content
Abstract
Yield comparison of java apple (Syzygium samarangense (Blume) Merr. & Perry) cv. ‘Thabthimchan’ in 4 training systems and high density planting was investigated at the Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University from December 2003 to June 2006. The training systems included open center, slender spindle, palmette and Y-trellis. The results showed that yield, yield efficiency and yield density were higher in the first bearing year than in the second bearing year. Java apple trees trained as open center showed the highest yield, yield efficiency, yield density and cumulative yield followed by slender spindle, Y-trellis and palmette respectively.
Article Details
Section
Research Articles
References
กวิศร์ วานิชกุล. 2546. การจัดทรงต้นและการตัดแต่งไม้ผล. สำนักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์, กรุงเทพฯ. 213 หน้า.
ประทีป กุณาศล. 2540. การตัดแต่งกิ่ง. วารสารเคหการเกษตร 21(11): 53-59.
เปรมปรี ณ สงขลา. 2545. ทับทิมจันท์...สุดยอดชมพู่แห่งปี. วารสารเคหการเกษตร 26 (2): 65-75.
มนตรี อิสรไกรศีล. 2544. ผลของระดับการตัดแต่งกิ่งก่อนการใช้สารพาโคลบิวทราโซลที่มีต่อการออกดอกนอกฤดูของมะม่วงพันธุ์เขียวเสวย. วารสารวิทยาศาสตร์เกษตร 32 (1-4 พิเศษ): 13-16.
Barone, E., T. Caruso, L. Di Marco and F. Sottile. 1995. Effect of orchard system on fruit quality of four early ripening peach cultivars: preliminary results. Acta Hort. 379: 49-57.
Bussi, C., F. Lescourret, M. Genard and R. Habib. 2005. Pruning intensity and fruit load influence vegetative and fruit growth in early-maturing peach tree (cv. Alexandra). Fruits 60(2): 133-142.
Carbo, J., G. Guanter, J. Bonany, J. Iglesias, R. Montserrat and R. Dalman, 2000. Comparative trials of different pruning and training systems on apple tree. National Meeting on Horticultural Science. Available: AGRIS Database. Accession no. IT2002060436 (July 4, 2005).
Corelli-Grappadelli, L. 2000. The palmette training system. Acta Hort. 513: 329- 336.
De Salvador, F.R. and C. Fiderghelli. 1993. Peach training systems to improve management efficiency and to reduce costs. Acta Hort. 349: 33-37.
Elfving, D.C. 1988. Economic effects of excessive vegetative growth in deciduous fruit trees. HortScience 23: 461-463.
Marini, R.P. 2003. Physiology of pruning fruit trees. (Online).Available:http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/treefruit/422025/422-025. html. (July 4, 2005).
Marsal, J., G. Lopez, M. Mata and J. Girona. 2006. Branch removal and defruiting for the amelioration of water stress effects on fruit growth during stage III of peachfruit development. Scientia Horticulturae 108: 55-60.
Mohammed, S. and L.A. Wilson. 1984. New techniques for tropical tree crop production. International Seminar on New Technologies in Food Production for the Eighties and Beyond-Agro-Tech’ 83, St. Augustine (Trinidad and Tobago). Available: AGRIS Database. Accession no. TT8700441 (July 4, 2005).
Moreno, J., F. Toribio and M.A. Manzano. 1998. Evaluation of palmette, marchand and vase training systems in cherry varieties. Acta Hort. 468: 485-489.
Polat, A.A., C. Durgac, O. Kamiloglu and O. Caliskan. 2004. Effect of different planting densities on vegetative growth, yield and fruit quality of loquat. Acta Hort. 632: 189-195.
Robinson, T. L. 1992. Performance of Y-shaped apple canopies at various angles in comparison with central leader trained trees. Acta Hort. 322: 79-86.
Robinson, T. L. 1997. Interaction of tree form and rootstock on light interception, yield and efficiency of ‘Empire’, ‘Delicious’ and ‘Jonagold’ apple trees trained to different systems. Acta Hort. 451: 427-436.
Robinson, T. L. and A.N. Lakso. 1991. Bases of yield and production efficiency in apple orchard systems. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116: 188-194.
Robinson, T. L., A.N. Lakso and S.G. Carpenter. 1991. Canopy development, yield, and fruit quality of ‘Empire’ and ‘Delicious‘ apple trees grown in four orchard production systems for ten years. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116(2): 179 - 187.
Robinson, T. L., J. Wünsche and A.N. Lakso. 1993. The influence of orchard system and pruning severity on yield, light interception, coversion efficiency, partitioning index and leaf area index. Acta Hort. 349: 123-127.
Rufato, L., A.D. Rossi, L. Picolotto, E. Parizoto and J.C. Fachinello. 2004. Evaluation ofvegetative and productive responses of two peach training systems (Y system and central leader) in an ICM orchard. Acta Hort. 636: 711–715.
Whiting, M. D., G. Lang and D. Ophardt. 2005. Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield and fruit quality. HortScience 40(3): 582-586.
ประทีป กุณาศล. 2540. การตัดแต่งกิ่ง. วารสารเคหการเกษตร 21(11): 53-59.
เปรมปรี ณ สงขลา. 2545. ทับทิมจันท์...สุดยอดชมพู่แห่งปี. วารสารเคหการเกษตร 26 (2): 65-75.
มนตรี อิสรไกรศีล. 2544. ผลของระดับการตัดแต่งกิ่งก่อนการใช้สารพาโคลบิวทราโซลที่มีต่อการออกดอกนอกฤดูของมะม่วงพันธุ์เขียวเสวย. วารสารวิทยาศาสตร์เกษตร 32 (1-4 พิเศษ): 13-16.
Barone, E., T. Caruso, L. Di Marco and F. Sottile. 1995. Effect of orchard system on fruit quality of four early ripening peach cultivars: preliminary results. Acta Hort. 379: 49-57.
Bussi, C., F. Lescourret, M. Genard and R. Habib. 2005. Pruning intensity and fruit load influence vegetative and fruit growth in early-maturing peach tree (cv. Alexandra). Fruits 60(2): 133-142.
Carbo, J., G. Guanter, J. Bonany, J. Iglesias, R. Montserrat and R. Dalman, 2000. Comparative trials of different pruning and training systems on apple tree. National Meeting on Horticultural Science. Available: AGRIS Database. Accession no. IT2002060436 (July 4, 2005).
Corelli-Grappadelli, L. 2000. The palmette training system. Acta Hort. 513: 329- 336.
De Salvador, F.R. and C. Fiderghelli. 1993. Peach training systems to improve management efficiency and to reduce costs. Acta Hort. 349: 33-37.
Elfving, D.C. 1988. Economic effects of excessive vegetative growth in deciduous fruit trees. HortScience 23: 461-463.
Marini, R.P. 2003. Physiology of pruning fruit trees. (Online).Available:http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/treefruit/422025/422-025. html. (July 4, 2005).
Marsal, J., G. Lopez, M. Mata and J. Girona. 2006. Branch removal and defruiting for the amelioration of water stress effects on fruit growth during stage III of peachfruit development. Scientia Horticulturae 108: 55-60.
Mohammed, S. and L.A. Wilson. 1984. New techniques for tropical tree crop production. International Seminar on New Technologies in Food Production for the Eighties and Beyond-Agro-Tech’ 83, St. Augustine (Trinidad and Tobago). Available: AGRIS Database. Accession no. TT8700441 (July 4, 2005).
Moreno, J., F. Toribio and M.A. Manzano. 1998. Evaluation of palmette, marchand and vase training systems in cherry varieties. Acta Hort. 468: 485-489.
Polat, A.A., C. Durgac, O. Kamiloglu and O. Caliskan. 2004. Effect of different planting densities on vegetative growth, yield and fruit quality of loquat. Acta Hort. 632: 189-195.
Robinson, T. L. 1992. Performance of Y-shaped apple canopies at various angles in comparison with central leader trained trees. Acta Hort. 322: 79-86.
Robinson, T. L. 1997. Interaction of tree form and rootstock on light interception, yield and efficiency of ‘Empire’, ‘Delicious’ and ‘Jonagold’ apple trees trained to different systems. Acta Hort. 451: 427-436.
Robinson, T. L. and A.N. Lakso. 1991. Bases of yield and production efficiency in apple orchard systems. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116: 188-194.
Robinson, T. L., A.N. Lakso and S.G. Carpenter. 1991. Canopy development, yield, and fruit quality of ‘Empire’ and ‘Delicious‘ apple trees grown in four orchard production systems for ten years. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116(2): 179 - 187.
Robinson, T. L., J. Wünsche and A.N. Lakso. 1993. The influence of orchard system and pruning severity on yield, light interception, coversion efficiency, partitioning index and leaf area index. Acta Hort. 349: 123-127.
Rufato, L., A.D. Rossi, L. Picolotto, E. Parizoto and J.C. Fachinello. 2004. Evaluation ofvegetative and productive responses of two peach training systems (Y system and central leader) in an ICM orchard. Acta Hort. 636: 711–715.
Whiting, M. D., G. Lang and D. Ophardt. 2005. Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield and fruit quality. HortScience 40(3): 582-586.
