Effects of shading on growth and bulb quality of tulip ‘Strong Gold’ produced on highland of Chiang Mai
Main Article Content
Abstract
Tulip is an important commercial flower bulb crop which annual turnover of tulip in the world market was about 215 million euros. Although light and temperature on highland of Thailand has high potential for tulip bulb production, but it was necessary to adjust lighting for related temperature. However, the research involved this topic was rarely reported. This research was aimed to study the effects of shading on growth, bulb formation and photosynthesis of tulip ‘Strong Gold’. Three levels of net shading i.e., 1) no shading (average light intensity is 568.67 µmol/m2/s2), 2) 50% net shading (average light intensity is 388.09 µmol/m2/s2) and 3) 70% net shading (average light intensity is 100.09 µmol/m2/s2) were studied in Hod district, Chiang Mai, at 1,000 m above sea levels with average temperature of 25.4 oC and RH 63.9 % (during the experimental). The experimental design was completely randomized design (CRD) with 3 treatments and 20 replications (1 bulb per replication). Plant height, number of leaves per plant, SPAD unit, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, bulb fresh and dry weights, number of new bulbs per plant, and total non-structural carbohydrate (TNC) were measured. The results indicated that plants grown under 50% net shading had the highest TNC content, fresh and dry weights of bulb (227.1 mg/bulb, 9.37 and 3.01 g, respectively). Number of new bulbs were not significant difference among treatments. Therefore, 50% net shading is suitable for growing tulips on highland of Chiang Mai.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
ดนัย บุญยเกียรติ. 2563. สรีรวิทยาของพืช. สำนักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่, เชียงใหม่.
วาริน สุทน. 2562. ผลของการพรางแสงต่อการเจริญเติบโต ผลผลิตและปริมาณสารเคอร์คูมินในไพล. วารสารมหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ (สาขาวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี). 22: 146-156.
วาสนา ใจกล้า. 2556. เทคโนโลยีการผลิตปทุมมานอกฤดูกาล. วิทยานิพนธ์ ปริญญาวิทยาศาสตร มหาบัณฑิต มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์. กรุงเทพฯ.
โสระยา ร่วมรังษี. 2558. สรีรวิทยาไม้ดอกประเภทหัว. สำนักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่, เชียงใหม่.
De Hertogh, A., and M. Le Nard. 1993. Physiological and biochemical aspects of flower bulbs. Elsevier, AMS.
Edwards D., and L Axe. 1992. Stomata and mechanics of stomatal functioning in some early land plants. Courier Forschungsinstitut. 147: 59 – 73.
Whistler, R. L. 1964. Methods in carbohydrate chemistry. Academic Press, New York.
Ju, P. and R. Zhu. 2015. Influence of different light intensities on growth and flowering of tulips (Tulipa gesneriana). Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi. 12: 33 – 36.
Kittas, C., N. Rigakis, N. Katsoulas, and T. Bartzanas., 2009. Influence of shading screens on microclimate, growth and productivity of tomato. Acta Hort. 807: 97 – 102.
Krause, G.H., and E. Weis. 1991. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The Basics. Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology. 42: 313 – 349.
Kumar, S., and S. M. K. 2019. Effect of light condition and height of flower harvesting on bulb and bulblet production in Asiatic hybrid lily. Journal of Applied Horticulture. 21(2): 164 – 168.
Mohr, H., and P. Schopfer. 1995. Plant Physiology. Springer, Berlin.
Rees, A.R. 1972. The Growth of Bulbs: Applied Aspects of the Physiology of Ornamental Bulbous Crop Plants. Academic Press, New York.
Statista. 2020. Value of the import and export of tulip bulbs in the Netherlands from 2008 to 2019. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/581482/value-of-the-import-and-export-of-tulip-bulbs-in-the-netherlands. Accessed Jan. 19, 2021.
Hongjian, X., Z. Zhu, Q. Guo, Z. Wu, H Ma, and Y. Miao. 2012. Effects of light intensity on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Tulipa edulis. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 37: 442 – 446.
Wassink, C. 1972. An attempt at separating productive and morphogenetic effects in the growth of some bulb plants. Veenman. 2: 72 – 31.