The comparison of freezing and thawing methods on boar semen quality

Main Article Content

Ruthaiporn Ratchamak
Thevin Vongpralub
Wuttigrai Boonkum
Vibuntita Chankitisakul

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to compare effects of different freezing and thawing methods on post-thawed boar semen quality. Semen was collected from two different breeds (Pietrain and Duroc). The freezing methods were treatment 1; -35 OC for 5 min and -120 OC for 10 min (11 and 5 cm. above the liquid nitrogen vapor); Treatment 2; -135 OC for 20 min(3 cm. above the liquid nitrogen vapor) and thawing methods were 60 OC for 8 sec; 42 OC for 25 sec) on sperm progressive motility, sperm viability, and plasma membrane integrity were determined.The results revealed that the progressive motility was higher in Pietrain than Duroc (P<0.05). Sperm progressive motility and viability were higher in Treatment 1 compared with Treatment 2 (P<0.05). Semen thawed at at 5 OC for 5 min and 60 OC for 8 sec were higher in every parameters compared to the semen thawed at 42 OC for 25 sec (P<0.05). However there was no interaction effect between freezing and thawing method on post-thawed sperm quality. In conclusion, it could be inferred that the freezing methods in Treatment 1 (-35 OC for 5 min and -120 OC for 10 min) and thawing methods 5 OC for 5 min could be used to maximize boar cryopreserved semen quality.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ratchamak, R. ., Vongpralub, T. ., Boonkum, W. ., & Chankitisakul, V. . (2019). The comparison of freezing and thawing methods on boar semen quality. Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal, 47(1), 159–168. retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/agkasetkaj/article/view/249793
Section
บทความวิจัย (research article)

References

เทวินทร์ วงษ์พระลับ. 2542. การสืบพันธุ์ในสัตว์ เลี้ยง Reproductive in domestic animals. โรงพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น, ขอนแก่น.

Amidi. F., A. Pazhohan, M.S. Nashtaei, M. Khodarahmian, and S. Nekoonam. 2016. The role of antioxidants in sperm freezing: a review. Cell. Tissue Bank. 17:745-756.

Athurupana, R., S. Ioki and H. Funahashi. 2015. Rapid thawing and stabilizing procedure improve postthaw survival and in vitro penetrability of boar spermatozoa cryopreserved with a glycerol-free trehalose-based extender. Theriogenology. 84:940-947.

Bamba, K., and D.G. Cran. 1988. Further studies on rapid dilution and warming of boar semen. J. Reprod. Fertil. 82:509-518.

Chanapiwat, P., K. Kaeoket and P. Tummaruk. 2012. Cryopreservation of boar semen by egg yolk-based extenders containing lactose or fructose is better than sorbitol. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 74(3): 351–354.

Chanapiwat, P., E.O. Olanratmanee., K. Kaeoket and P. Tummaruk. 2014. Conception rate and litter size in multiparous sows after intrauterine insemination using frozen-thawed boar semen in a commercial swine herd in thailand. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 76: 1347–1351.

Chanapiwat, P. and K. Kaeoket. 2015. Breed of boar influences the optimal concentration of gamma-oryzanol needed for semen cryopreservation. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 50: 221–226.

Chuaychu-Noo. N., P. Thananurak, V. Chankitisakul, and T. Vongpralub. 2017. Supplementing rooster sperm with cholesterol-loadedcyclodextrinimproves fertility after cryopreservation. Cryobiology. 74:8-12.

Dai, J. J., C. F. Wu, D. F. Zhang, F. Z. Yin, T. Y. Zhang, D. Liu, H. L. Wu, L. L. Li, S. T. Yang and L. Wang. 2009. Some Factors Affecting Freezing of Boar Semen in 5 ml Maxi-straws. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 22:507 – 515.

Fazano, F.A.T., 1986. ZurKryokonservierung von Ebersperma verschiedene Verfahren zur Samenbehandlung und u n t e r s c h i e d l i e d l i c h e Konfektionierungsmetoden unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Einfriergeschwindigkeit. Thesis, Hannover Veterinary College.

Fraser, L., L. Zasiadczyk, and J. Strzezek, 2010. Interactions of egg yolk lipoprotein fraction with boar spermatozoa assessed with a fluorescent membrane probe. Folia. Histochem. Cytobiol. 48:292-298.

Gilmore, J.A., D. Junying, T. Jun, A.T. Peter, and J.K. Crister. 1996. Osmotic properties of boar spermatozoa and their relevance to cryopreservation. J. Reprod. Fertil. 107:87-95.

Gao, D., and JK. Critser. 2000. Mechanisms of cryoinjury in living cells. ILAR. J. 41:96-187.

Kaeoket, K., K.Tantiparinyakul, W. Kladkaew, P. Chanapiwat, and M. Techakumphu 2008. Effect of different antioxidants on quality of cryopreserved boar semen in different breeds. Thai J. Agri. Sci. 41:1-9.

Marko S., T. Dobranic, S. Kruslin, M. Cergolj, M. Karadjole, N. Prvanovic, and J. Grizelj. 2008. The use of the hypoosmotic swelling test and supravital staining in evaluation of sperm quality in boars. Vet. Arh. 78:279-287.

Mazur, P., and K.W.Cole. 1985. Influence of cell concentration on the contribution of unfrozen fraction and salt concentration to the survival of slowly frozen human erythrocytes. Cryobiology. 22:509-536.

Muldrew, K., and LE. McGann. 1994. The osmotic rupture hypothesis of intracellular freezing injury. Biophys. J. 66:532-541.

Okazaki, T., and M. Shimada. 2012. New trategies of boar sperm crypreservation development of novel freezing and thawing methods with a focus on the roles of seminal plasma. Anim. Sci. J. 83:623-629.

Parks, J.E. and D.V. 1992. Lynch. Lipid composition and thermotropic phase behavior of boar, bull, stallion, and rooster sperm membranes. Cryobiology. 29: 255-266.

Rodriguez-Gil, J.E., and E. Estrada. 2013. Artificial insemination in boar reproduction. In:zBonet S, Casas I, Holt WV, Yeste M(eds), Boar Reproduction. Springer, Berlin.

Rodriguez-Martinez, H., and M. Wallgren. 2011. Advances in boar semen cryopreservation. Vet. Med. Inter. 2011:1-5.

Schulze, M., D. Waberski, S. Buder, K. Rudiger, and M. Beyerbach. 2014. Influences on semen traits used for selection of young AI boars. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 148:164-170.

Steel, R.G.D., and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principle and procedures of statistics: A Biomaterial Approach. 2nd Ed. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York.

Tierz, A., A. M. Kawecka, A. Pietruszka, E. Jacyno, R. Czarnecki, and M. Kamyczek. 2008. Quality of semen of young boars of the breeds Pietrain and Duroc and their reciprocal crosses. Dummerstorf. 51:42-54.

Tomas, C., J. Gomez-Fernandez, E. GomezIzquierdo, and E. de Mercado. 2014. Effect of the holding time at 15°C prior to cryopreservation, the thawing rate and the post-thaw incubation temperature on the boar sperm quality after cryopreservation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 144:115-121.

Vongpralub, T. 2016. Semen storage and artificial insemination in poultry. Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen.

Vongpralub, T., A. Utha, J. Pongpeng, P. Sonseeda, and W. Yindee 2011. A comparison of simple vapour method and programmable freezer on motility and fertility of frozen Thai native frozen semen. Proceeding of The 3th international conference on sustainable animal agriculture for developing countries, July 26-29, 2011, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.

Waterhouse, K.E., P.O. Hofmo, A. Tverdal, and R.R. Miller Jr. 2006. Within and between breed differences in freezing tolerance and plasma membrane fatty acid composition of boar sperm. Reproduction. 131:887-894.

Wiest, S.C., and P.L. Steponkus. 1979. The osmometric behavior of human erythrocytes. Cryobiology. 16:101-104.

Yeste, M. 2015. Recent advances in boar sperm cryopreservation: state of the art and current perspectives. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 50:71-79.

Yeste, M. 2016. Sperm cryopreservation update: cryodamage, markers, and factors affecting the sperm freezability in pigs. Theriogenology. 85:47-56.