Soil organic carbon and stable carbon locations in different textural paddy soils

Main Article Content

Wut Sriwichai
Daungsamorn Tulaphitak
Phrueksa Lawongsa
Patcharee Saenjan

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine location of stable organic carbon identified by using appropriate indicator conducting with various soil-aggregate sizes of two textural paddy soils, loam (Ratchaburi series, Rb) and sandy loam (Ubon series, Ub ). Soil aggregate sizes were separated into: 4-2 mm (LMa), 2-1 mm (MMa), 1-0.25 mm (SMa), 0.25-0.053 mm (Mi) and <0.053 mm (FMi). Soil organic carbon (SOC), labile organic carbon (LOC) and non LOC:SOC ratio were determined and calculated. It was found that SOC content in loam and sandy loam were 1.073-1.557 percent and 0.377-0.823 percent, respectively; LOC content in loam and sandy loam were 0.721-0.885 mg/kg and 0.603-0.806 mg/kg, respectively; while non LOC:SOC ratio in loam and sandy loam were 0.909-0.954 and 0.811-0.925 respectively. In respect of soil aggregate sizes of both textural soils, SOC content in FMi was highest, 1.188 percent; while that in LMa was lowest, 0.92 percent. LOC content in LMa was highest, 0.798 mg/kg; while that in Mi was lowest, 0.641 mg/kg. And non LOC:SOC ratio in Mi was highest, 0.935; while that in LMa was lowest, 0.875. The results from both textural soils led to a conclusion that aggregates of Mi has stability more than that of LMa by mean of the proposed mechanisms: clay–P–non LOC, clay–P–SOC, clay–P–LOC and clay–P–clay. The present research showed that non LOC:SOC ratio is an appropriate indicator, which is essential to explain soil-organic-carbon stability in soil aggregates. And it also revealed that non LOC contains with a large quantity as a major component of SOC more than LOC in each soil aggregate size.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sriwichai, W. ., Tulaphitak, D. ., Lawongsa, P. ., & Saenjan, P. . (2018). Soil organic carbon and stable carbon locations in different textural paddy soils. Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal, 46(3), 481–486. retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/agkasetkaj/article/view/250087
Section
บทความวิจัย (research article)

References

พัชรี แสนจันทร์, กาญจนา คำปุทา, ศุภชัย หอมพันนา และพฤกษา หล้าวงษา. 2559. ปริมาณมวลชีวภาพจุลินทรีย์คาร์บอนบริเวณรากข้าวในดินนาที่มีเนื ้อดินต่างกันที่ได้รับถ่านชีวภาพและฟางข้าว. แก่นเกษตร. 44(ฉบับพิเศษ 1): 252-258.
Baver, L.D., W.H. Gardner, and W.R. Gardner. 1972. Soil Physics. 4th Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Bronick, C.J., and R. Lal. 2005. Soil structure and management: A review. Geoderma. 124: 3–22.
Demirel, B., and P. Scherer. 2008. The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: A review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 7: 173-190.
Fernandez, R., A. Quiroga, C. Zorati, and E. Noellemeyer. 2010. Carbon contents and respiration rates of aggregate size fractions under no-till and conventional tillage. Soil & Tillage Research. 109: 103–109.
Helgason, B.L., F.L. Walley, and J.J. Germida. 2010. No-till soil management increases microbial biomass and alters community profiles in soil aggregates. Applied Soil Ecology. 46: 390–397.
Hobley, E. U., J. Baldock, and B. Wilson. 2016. Environmental and human influences on organic carbon fractions down the soil profile. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 223: 152-166.
Luo, L., H. Lin, and S. Li. 2010. Quantification of 3-D soil macropore networks in different soil types and land uses using computed tomography. Journal of Hydrology. 393: 53–64.
Marland, G., C.T. Garten Jr., W.M. Post, and T.O. West. 2004. Studies on enhancing carbon sequestration in soils. Energy. 29: 1643–1650.
Mangalassery, S., S. Sjogersten, D.L. Sparkes, C. J. Sturrock, and S.J. Mooney. 2013. The effect of soil aggregate size on pore structure and its consequence on emission of greenhouse gases. Soil & Tillage Research. 132: 39–46.
Mc Lean, E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: A. L. Page Edition. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. pp. 199-224.
Moody, P.W., and P.T. Cong. 2008. Soil constraints and management package (SCAMP): guidelines for sustainable management of tropical upland soil. ACIAR Monograph No. 130, Australian center for international agricultural research, Canberra.
Plante, A.F., R.T. Conant, C.E. Stewart, K. Paustian, and J. Six. 2006. Impact of soil texture on the distribution of soil organic matter in physical and chemical fractions. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 70: 287–296.
Puttaso, A., P. Vityakon, F. Rasche, P. Saenjan, V. Treloges, and G, Cadisch. 2013. Does Organic Residue Quality Influence Carbon Retention in a Tropical Sandy Soil?. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 77: 1001-1011.
Tisdall, J.M., and J.M. Oades. 1982. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. Journal Soil Science. 33: 141–163.
Walkley, A., and I. A. Black. 1934. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science. 37: 29-33.
Udawatta, R.P., and S.H. Anderson. 2008. CT-measured pore characteristics of surface and subsurface soils influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers. Geoderma. 145: 381–389.
Yang, X., J. Meng, Y. Lan, W. Chen, T. Yang, J. Yuan, S. Liu, and J. Han. 2017. Effects of maize stover and its biochar on soil CO2 emissions and labile organic carbon fractions in Northeast China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 240: 24-31.