Sugarcane genotype response in leaf traits to flooding condition in early growth stage

Main Article Content

Pitchatorn Maitreemitr
Nongluk Teinseree
Cattleya Chutteang
Patiwat Sookgul
Amarawan Tippayawat
Anuruck Arunyanark

Abstract

Flooding has become one of a serious problem for sugarcane production in Thailand because sugarcane production has dramatically increased in lowland. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of flooding in early growth stage of sugarcane on leaf traits. The response of sugarcane genotypes to flooding, and the relationships between leaf traits and flooding tolerance of sugarcane were evaluated in this study. A 5 × 2 factorial in completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications was used. Five sugarcane genotypes were evaluated for a comparison between control and flooding conditions in early growth stage. Data were collected on leaf traits, pigment content in leaf and total dry weight. Flooding condition reduced leaf dry weight, number of leaf, leaf area, leaf size, leaf moisture content and specific leaf area but increased pigment content. The genotype variation was found in all traits of this study. There was different response of sugarcane genotype to flooding conditions for leaf traits.  Moreover, there were differences among genotypes for flooding tolerance. The correlation coefficients between tolerant index for total dry weight and tolerant index for leaf dry weight (r = 0.88**), leaf area (r = 0.83**) and leaf size (r = 0.94**) were highly positive and significant .These findings suggest that leaf parameters are strongly linked with flooding tolerance in sugarcane.

Article Details

How to Cite
Maitreemitr, P. ., Teinseree, N. ., Chutteang, C. ., Sookgul, P. ., Tippayawat, A. ., & Arunyanark, A. . (2021). Sugarcane genotype response in leaf traits to flooding condition in early growth stage . Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal, 49(4), 892–902. retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/agkasetkaj/article/view/251393
Section
บทความวิจัย (research article)

References

จิราพร บำรุงไร่, อรุณี พรมคำบุตร และอนันต์ พลธานี. 2557. ปัญหาและข้อจำกัดในการปลูกอ้อยในนาพื้นที่ราบน้ำท่วมถึงและพื้นที่ลูกคลื่นลอนตื้น ตำบลดอนหัน อำเภอเมือง จังหวัดขอนแก่น. แก่นเกษตร. 42: 208-217.

สถาบันวิจัยพืชไร่และพืชทดแทนพลังงาน. 2552. เอกสารแนะนำ คู่มือการปลูกอ้อย. สถาบันวิจัยพืชไร่และน้ำตาล กรมวิชาการเกษตร.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการอ้อยและน้ำตาลทราย. 2561. รายงานพื้นที่ปลูกอ้อย ปีการผลิต 2560/61. กลุ่มเทคโนโลยีสารสนเทศและการสื่อสาร กองยุทธศาสตร์และแผนงาน. สำนักงานคณะกรรมการอ้อยและน้ำตาลทราย.

Glaz, B., and S.E. Lingle. 2012. Flood duration and time of flood onset effects on recently planted sugarcane. Agronomy Journal. 104: 575-583.

Gomathi, R., P. N. Gururaja Rao, K. Chandran, and A. Selvi. 2015. Adaptive responses of sugarcane to waterlogging stress: An over view. Sugar Tech. 17: 325-338.

Jain, R., A. Singh, S. Singh, P. Surendra, V. Kumar Srivastava, A. Chandra, A. Dutt Pathak, and S. Solomon. 2017. Physio-Biochemical characterization of sugarcane genotypes for waterlogging tolerance. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 13(2): 90-97.

Jaiphong, T., J. Tominaga, K. Watanabe, R. Suwa, M. Ueno, and Y. Kawamitsu. 2017. Change in photosynthesis, growth, and sugar content of commercial sugarcane cultivar and Erianthus under flood conditions. Plant Production Science. 20: 126-135.

Misra, V., S. Solomon, A.K. Mall, C.P. Prajapati, A. Hashem, E.F. A. Allah, and M.I. Ansari. 2020. Morphological assessment of water stressed sugarcane: A comparison of waterlogged and drought affected crop. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 27: 1228–1236.

Rajput, R.D., and R.P. Patil. 2017. The comparative study on spectrophotometric analysis of chlorophyll and carotenoids pigments from non-leguminous fodder crops. International Journal of Innovative Science Engineering and Technology. 4: 140-148.

Singh, S., S.P. Singh, A.D. Pathak, and N. Pandey. 2019. Assessment of waterlogging induced physio-biochemical changes in sugarcane varieties and its association with waterlogging tolerance. Journal of Environmental Biology. 40: 384-392.