Comparison on Growth, Yield and Total Lactone Content of Different Andrographis paniculata Varieties Grown in Lysimeter Tank

Authors

  • Parinyawadee Sritontip Agricultural Technology Research Institute, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Lampang
  • Chiti Sritontip Agricultural Technology Research Institute, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Lampang
  • Seksan Wongsiri Faculty of Science and Agricultural Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Lampang
  • Manassawee Wangchailerd Agricultural Technology Research Institute, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Lampang
  • Butsarin Boontem Agricultural Technology Research Institute, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Lampang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/jare-mju.2025.21

Keywords:

Andrographis paniculata, stem growth, total lactone content, lysimeter tanks

Abstract

The objective of this research was to compare the growth, yield, and total lactone content of four varieties of Andrographis paniculata cultivated in lysimeter tanks for water and nutrient use studies. The experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Technology Research Institute, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Lampang Province. The experiment followed a completely randomized design (CRD) with eight replications and four treatments, including Phichit 4–4, Phitsanulok 5–4, and two commercial varieties (Golden Mountain brand and Compass brand variety). The results showed no statistically significant differences in stem growth and physiology. However, significant differences were observed in yield, yield components, and phytochemical concentrations. The Phitsanulok 5-4 and Compass brand varieties produced the highest dry weights, with averages of 20.26 and 20.74 grams per plant, respectively. Meanwhile, Phichit 4-4 and Golden Mountain brand varieties had average dry weights of 17.12 and 16.28 grams per plant, respectively. The total lactone content, calculated as andrographolide, exceeded the standard for Andrographis paniculata in all four varieties, ranging from 23.64 to 27.70 grams per 100 grams of dry weight. Among them, the Phichit 4-4 variety had the highest average value.

References

Chaemcheun, K., S. Anuttato, P. kheawpumpuang and C. Kongnakhon. 2020. Andrographis Paniculata: High-Quality Varieties for Combating the COVID-19 Crisis. 8 p. In Research Report. Phitsanulok: Office of Agricultural Research and Development Region 2. [in Thai]

Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health. 2016. Thai Herbal Pharmacopoeia 2016. Bangkok: The Agricultural Co-operative Federation of Thailand. 659 p.

Ditchaiwong, Ch., S. Chamchumroon, D. Tonpayom, M. Saengphet, S. Prasongsap, J. Suphaphon, S. Chingduang, K. Tawong, S. Wanasit, T. Pudchang, P. Rungrawee, W. Toliang, and S. Chaikiattiyos. 2015. Research and Development of Andrographis Paniculata (Burm. F.) Nees for Increasing Yield and Qualities. 14 p. In Research Report. Bangkok: Department of Agriculture. [in Thai]

Hoagland, D.R. and D.I. Arnon. 1938. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circular. California Agricultural Experiment Station 347: 1–39.

Liphan, S. 2023. Influence of different cultivars and cutting lengths on growth of Kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Nees). Rajabhat agric. 22(1): 31–40. [in Thai]

Office of the Permanent Secretary for Ministry of Agricultural and Cooperatives. 2023. Assessment of Herbal Product Production by the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. Bangkok: Office of the Permanent Secretary for Ministry of Agricultural and Cooperatives. 69 p. [in Thai]

Onsa, N.E., S.K. Prasad, T. Chaiyaso, C. Lumsangkul and S.R. Sommano. 2022. Phenotypic and chemotypic relations among local Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Wall landrace Collection. Horticulturae 8(10): 978.

Phongphrom, A., A. Watthanathiratham, P. Kaewfu, P. Premying and N. Hinkaew. 2021. Cultivation of Medicinal Herbs: Andrographis Paniculata. Bangkok: Technology Transfer and Development Offices and Agricultural Land Reform Office. 15 p. [in Thai]

Sakuanrungsirikul, S., A. Jetana, P. Buddanoi and J. Dithachaiyawong. 2008. Intraspecific variability assessment of Andrographis paniculata collections using molecular markers. Acta Horticulturae 786(10): 283–286.

Sharma, S. and Y.P. Sharma. 2018. Comparison of different extraction methods and HPLC method development for the quantification of andrographolide from Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Wall. ex Nees. Annals of Phytomedicine 7(1): 119–130.

Supakamnerd, N. 1999. Analysis of ammonium nitrogen by colorimetric method. Chiang Rai: Chiang Rai Horticultural Research Center. 2 p. [in Thai]

Suriyaphromchai, P., C. Ditchaiwong, L. Anukhun and S. Meesuk. 2011. Testing Andrographis Paniculata Varieties for Recommended Cultivation. 46 p. In Research Report. Bangkok: Department of Agriculture, Office of Agricultural Research and Development Region 1, Phare Agricultural Research and Development Center. [in Thai]

Talei, D. 2019. Morpho-physiological diversity of Andrographis paniculata accessions using multivariate analysis. Horticulture International Journal 3(4): 173–177.

Published

2025-08-26

How to Cite

Sritontip, P. ., Sritontip, C. ., Wongsiri, S. ., Wangchailerd, M. ., & Boontem, B. . (2025). Comparison on Growth, Yield and Total Lactone Content of Different Andrographis paniculata Varieties Grown in Lysimeter Tank . Journal of Agricultural Research and Extension, 42(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14456/jare-mju.2025.21

Issue

Section

Research Article