Guidelines for Evaluating the Efficiency of Biochar in Reducing Soil Acidity

Authors

  • Podjanee Sangmanee Division of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Uttaradit Rajabhat University, Uttaradit

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/jare-mju.2025.28

Keywords:

soil acidity, biochar, precise rate, growth performance

Abstract

Evaluation of suitable application rate of biochar produced from various agricultural and agro-industrial materials is required to serve as a guideline for farmers. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the optimal application rate of biochar and assess its potential impact on early plant growth. The study consisted of three main steps: (1) optimizing the biochar application rate before conducting a pot experiment, (2) studying the chemical and physical properties of the selected biochar and (3) evaluating plant growth responses. The initial experiment involved incubating acidic soils with known lime requirement (LR) alongside biochar derived from spent mushroom substrate (SMS) and coconut shell (CS), which was mixed with slaked lime (L). Five treatments were tested: SMS 0.5LR, SMS 0.75LR, CS:L (3:1) LR, and CS:L (1:1) LR. A completely randomized design (CRD) with 3 replications was employed. Results showed that SMS 0.5LR and CS:L (1:3) LR effectively increased soil pH without exceeding 7.5, making them suitable for further investigation. A subsequent experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with six replications. Treatments included slaked lime at LR, SMS at 0.5LR, CS:L (1:3) at LR, and recommended chemical fertilizers, compared to untreated acidic soil. Plant growth parameters, including leaf greenness, and nutrient deficiency symptoms, in baby corn (Zea mays L.) were determined. Results indicated that both biochar treatments enhanced plant growth comparable to the lime treatment.

References

Abeba, K.S., G.T. Abera and K. Chimdessa. 2024. Examining the effect of combined biochar and lime rates on selected soil physicochemical properties of acid soils in Gimbi district, Western Ethiopia. Applied and Environment Soil Science 4440448. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4440448

Adekiya, A.O., B.B. Ayorinde and T. Ogunbode. 2024. Combined lime and biochar application enhances cowpea growth and yield in tropical Alfisol. Scientific Reports. 14(1): 1389. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52102-7

ASTM International. 2009. ASTM D2867-09: Standard Test Method for Total Ash Content of Activated Carbon. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken: ASTM International. 4 p.

ASTM International. 2017. ASTM D2867-17: Standard Test Methods for Moisture in Activated Carbon. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken: ASTM International. 3 p.

Bolan, N., A.K. Sarmah, S. Bordoloi, S. Bolan, L. Padhye, L. Van Zwieten, P. Sooriyakumar, B.A. Khan, M. Ahmad, Z. Solaiman, J. Rinklebe, H. Wang, B.P. Singh and K.H.M. Siddique. 2023. Soil acidification and the liming potential of biochar. Environmental Pollution 317: 120632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120632

Castilla-Caballero D., J. Barraza-Burgos, S. Gunasekaran, A. Roa-Espinosa, J. Colina- Márquez, F. Machuca-Martínez, A. Hernández-Ramírez and S. Vázquez-Rodríguez. 2020. Experimental data on the production and characterization of biochars derived from coconut-shell wastes obtained from the Colombian Pacific Coast at low temperature pyrolysis. Data in Brief 28: 104855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104855

Department of Agriculture. 2005. Fertilizer recommendation for economic crops: Academic document no. 8/2005. [Online]. Available https://ebook.lib.ku.ac.th/ebook27/ebook/2011-004-0028/ (December 31, 2024). [in Thai]

Dharmakeerthi, R.S., J.A.S. Chandrasiri and V.U. Edirimanne. 2012. Effect of rubber wood biochar on nutrition and growth of nursery plants of Hevea brasiliensis established in an Ultisol. SpringerPlus 1: 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-1-84

Giovannetti, M., A., Salviolo di Fossalunga, I.A. Stringlis, S. Proietti and V. Fiorillo. 2023. Unearthing soil-plant-mocrobiota crosstalk: looking back to move forward. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 1082752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1082752

Godlewska, P., S.O. Yong and P. Oleszczuk. 2021. The dark of black gold: ecotoxicological aspects of biochar and biochar-amended soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials 403: 123833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123833

Kissel, D.E., R.A. Isaac, R. Hitchcock, L.S. Sonon and P.F. Vendrell. 2007. Implementation of soil lime requirement by single-addition titration method. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 38: 1341–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620701328735

Kissel, D.E., L. Sonon and M. Cabrela. 2012. Rapid measurement of soil pH buffering capacity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76: 694-699. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0091

Land Development Department. 2015. State of soil and land resources of Thailand. [Online]. Available https://e-library.ldd.go.th/library/flip/bib9456f/bib9456f. html (December 31, 2024). [in Thai]

Liu, M., D.E. Kissel, M.L. Cabrera and P.F. Vendrell. 2005. Soil lime requirement by direct titration with single addition of calcium hydroxide. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69: 522–530. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0522

Shaaban, A., S.M. Se, N.M.M. Mitan and M.F. Dimin. 2013. Characterization of biochar derived from rubber wood sawdust through slow pyrolysis on surface porosities and functional groups. Procedia Engineering 68: 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.193

Sims, J.T. 1996. Lime Requirement. pp. 491–515. In Sparks, D.L. (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3 Chemical Methods. Madison, Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America. Inc.

Singh, B., M.M. Dolk, Q. Shen and M. Camp-Arbestain. 2017. Biochar pH, Electrical Conductivity and Liming Potential. pp. 23–38. In Singh, B. (ed.). Biochar: A Guide to Analytical Methods. Clayton South, Victoria: CSIRO Publishing.

Suriyawong, P., S. Chuetor, H. Samae, S. Piriyakarnsakul, M. Amin, M. Furuuchi, M. Hata, M. Inerb and W. Phairuang. 2023. Airborne particulate matter from biomass burning in Thailand: recent issues, challenges, and options. Heliyon 9(3): e14261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14261

Thompson, J., D. Kissel, M. Cabrera and L. Sonon. 2010. Equilibration reaction from single addition of base to determine soil lime requirement. Soil Science Society of America Journal 74: 663–669. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0168

Tusar, H.M., M.K. Udding, S. Mia, A.A. Suhu, S.B.A. Alam, S. Kaaim, N.A. Sairi, Z. Alam and F. Anwar. 2023. Biochar-acid soil interactions-a review. Sustainability 15: 13366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813366.

Published

2025-08-26

How to Cite

Sangmanee, P. (2025). Guidelines for Evaluating the Efficiency of Biochar in Reducing Soil Acidity. Journal of Agricultural Research and Extension, 42(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.14456/jare-mju.2025.28

Issue

Section

Research Article