Development of an Intensive Native Goat Rearing Model to Enhance Production Efficiency for Vulnerable Youth in Thailand's Southern Border Provinces

Authors

  • Yakoh Karemdabeh Chemistry Education Program, Faculty of Education, Fatoni University, Pattani, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4482-2128
  • Suhaimin Chemalee Science Division, Faculty of Science and Technology, Fatoni University, Pattani, Thailand
  • Niramol Juntarachat Chemistry Program, Faculty of Engineering, Thaksin University, Phatthalung Campus, Phatthalung, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/jare-mju.2026.12

Keywords:

intensive goat farming, native goats, at-risk youth (unemployed)

Abstract

This study aimed to develop an intensive native goat farming model and to enhance rearing capabilities for vulnerable (unemployed) youth in Thailand's southern border provinces. Using a completely randomized design (CRD), twenty 6–7-month-old native goats were divided into four groups (5 goats/group): Group 1 received only Napier grass; Group 2 received Napier grass supplemented with 2% BW commercial feed; Group 3 received Napier grass plus 2% BW concentrated feed Formula A (yeast-fermented corn); Group 4 received Napier grass plus 2% BW concentrated feed Formula B (rice bran + fish meal).  (After a 120-day trial (concluding at week 16), initial weights were 7.73±1.00, 7.60±1.07, 7.73±0.81, and 7.66±1.10 kg/animal for Groups 1–4, respectively, with weight gain percentages of 19.81, 29.50, 31.59, and 36.17%, respectively). Nutritional analysis revealed that Formula A contained 13.8% crude protein, 8.1% fat, 10.2% crude fiber (CF), and 40–50% moisture; whereas Formula B contained 15.20% protein, 4.5% fat, 9.4% crude fiber (CF), and 40–50% moisture. Fresh Napier grass contained 9.8% protein, 0.6% fat, 33.2% crude fiber (CF), and 9.3% moisture, while fermented Napier grass

 

contained 10.2% protein, 10.2% fat, 32.1% crude fiber (CF), and 9.9% moisture. Production costs averaged at 5.80 THB/kg (dry) and 3.49 THB/kg (fresh) for Formula A, and 10.54 THB/kg (dry) and 6.33 THB/kg (fresh) for Formula B, enabling farmers to reduce feed costs by over 50%.

 

 

References

Department of Livestock Development. 2023. Goat population statistics and operational plan 2023–2027. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. 104 p. [in Thai]

FAO. 2024. Analysing data from on-farm trials: ANOVA and factorial experiments. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/a5abbb18-2bd2-4811-b1bef8bd1f8d4bf8/content/x5470e06.htm

Gómez-Limón, J.A. and L. Riesgo. 2012. Sustainability assessment of olive groves in Andalusia: a methodological proposal. New Medit 11(1): 39–49.

Hamid, A.M. 2024. Assistance in fattening goat farming business: Diversification strategy and productivity improvement "Gus Shor Farm" Kanugrahan Maduran Lamongan Village, Sahwahita. Community Engagement Journal 1(2): 79–95. https://doi.org/10.69965/sahwahita.v1i2.57

Khan, N. and M. Hussein. 2021. Analysis of profits and break even point of Jamnapari goat farming. Journal La Lifesci. 2(3): 8–14. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallalifesci.v2i3.377

Kongkaew, P. 2020. Community waste management and waste in goat farms. Bangkok: National Research Council of Thailand. 144 p. [in Thai]

Massachusetts Institute of Technology D-Lab, and Heifer International. 2016. Needs assessment of smallholder goat farmers in Odisha, India (D-Brief). Retrieved from https://d-lab.mit.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/Heifer%20Goat%20Herder%20D-Brief%20v12%20(1).pdf

Mehanzel, S.H. 2012. Impact of Goat Development Project on Livelihood Assets: The Case of Northern Red Sea Region in Eritrea. Master Thesis. Wageningen University & Research Repository. 63 p.

Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Livestock Research Improvement Division. (n.d.). Goat Management Systems. Jamaica: Bodles Research Station. 8 p.

Polviset, W. and N. Prakobsaeng. 2019. The Comparison of Protein Sources in Total Mixed Ration in Goats. 30 p. In Research Report. Maha Sarakham: Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University.

Santoso, A.B., K. Bekzhanov, S.F. Batubara, A.R. Hasyim, S. Hidayat, V. Aryati, R.A. Saptati and N.Chairuman. 2024. Feed sufficiency model on corn-goat integration in Deli Serdang Regency North Sumatra, Indonesia. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 19(2): 639–648. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.190230

Sebsibe, A. and Z. Tadesse. 2011. Design of an Experiment to Compare Performance and Meat Quality Characteristics of Three Ethiopian Goat Genotypes under Varying Nutritional Conditions: Biometrics and Research Methods Teaching Resource Case Study 13. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). 15 p.

Urošević, M., D. Drobnjak, N. Ersoy and P. Stoji. 2020. Osnovni principi organske proizvodnje u kozarstvu [basic principles of organic goat farming]. Veterinarska Stanica 51(1): 87–91. https://doi.org/10.46419/vs.51.1.9

Figure 4   The biweekly weighing (8:00–9:00 AM) helped minimize variations due to feeding schedules, ensuring reliable growth trend analysis

Published

2026-03-20

How to Cite

Karemdabeh, Y., Chemalee , S. ., & Juntarachat, N. . (2026). Development of an Intensive Native Goat Rearing Model to Enhance Production Efficiency for Vulnerable Youth in Thailand’s Southern Border Provinces. Journal of Agricultural Research and Extension, 43(1), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.14456/jare-mju.2026.12

Issue

Section

Research Article