Branding and Brand Awareness of Farm Chao Khun By KMITL

Main Article Content

Jeeranun Khermkhan
Runkunenarniht Kunhalung
Prapat Athipanjapong
Rattama Rattanawongsa

Abstract

The objectives of this research were 1) to study the branding process of Farm Chao Khun By KMITL; and 2) to study brand awareness of Farm Chao Khun By KMITL. In order to study the branding process, in-depth interviews were conducted with ten KMITL Board of Directors members and staff, and with twenty-five regular customers. Meanwhile, to study brand awareness, questionnaires were given to and collected from two hundred and eighty-two customers. In this case, the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage and standard deviation and including T-Test and F-Test statistics with content analysis. According to the results, there were six steps to the branding process: 1) Identification of the target group consisting in individuals from inside and outside of the institute who were interested in healthy agricultural products, 22) Design of a brand that brings with it the features of quality and safety, has research accreditation, and embodies student participation,  3)  Creation  of brand awareness of credibility and guaranteed quality, 4) Presentation of information relating to the product brand to the customers via strategies and marketing activities, 5) Promotion of the product during the product establishment period, and 6) Managing brand loyalty by stressing that consumers are not only getting good quality and safe products; they are also supporting the education process of students when they buy the product. The results of the research were that overall brand awareness was at a high level. When considering each aspect separately, it was found that the brand awareness of organizational culture was the highest, and it was followed by product advantage, product personality, value and properties. With respect to product awareness and buyer and user characteristics, it was found that brand awareness of Farm Chao Khun By KMITL varied with consumer gender, age, education level , occupation and average income per month. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Khermkhan, J. ., Kunhalung, R., Athipanjapong, P. ., & Rattanawongsa, R. . (2022). Branding and Brand Awareness of Farm Chao Khun By KMITL. King Mongkut’s Agricultural Journal, 40(2), 206–215. retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/agritechjournal/article/view/254992
Section
Research Articles

References

เกศินี บัวดิศ และกัลยา พิมพ์เพราะ. 2564. การสร้างแบรนด์ให้ประสบความสำเร็จด้วยเครื่องมือนวัตกรรมทางการสื่อสารการตลาด. วารสารวิชาการและวิจัย มหาวิทยาลัยภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ 11(2): 305-320.

ศิริวรรณ เสรีรัตน์, ปริญ ลักษิตานนท์ และศุภร เสรีรัตน์. 2552. การบริหารตลาดยุคใหม่. กรุงเทพฯ: พัฒนาศึกษา.

อัมพล ชูสนุก, จอมพล เวชการ, ฉวีวรรณ ชูสนุก และกิตติ เจริญพรพานิชกุล. 2560. อิทธิพลการรับรู้คุณค่าด้านราคา และด้านคุณภาพต่อความ

ไว้วางใจ ความพึงพอใจ การบอกต่อ และการกลับมาซื้อซ้ำของผู้บริโภคสินค้าไทยกูลิโกะในเขตกรุงเทพมหานคร. วารสารบริหารธุรกิจ

ศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ 8(1): 13-26.

Aaker, D. A. 1991. Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: The Free Press.

Hanf, J. H. and Kühl, R. 2005. Branding and its consequences for German agribusiness. Agribusiness 21(2): 177-189.

Keller, K. L. 2008. Strategic branding management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River:

Prentice Hall.

Marin, L., Ruiz, S. and Rubio, A. 2009. The role of identity salience in the effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 84(1): 65-78.

Oyedele, A., Saldivar, R., Hernandez, M. D. and Goenne, E. 2018. Modeling Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention of Mobile Smart Wristbands: The Role of Social Mindfulness and Perceived Value. Young Consumers 19(3): 237-250.

Randall, G. 1997. Branding. Great Britain: Clay.