Effect of watering frequency on fruit cracking in ‘Nam Hom’ coconut

Main Article Content

พงษ์นาถ นาถวรานันต์

Abstract

Fruit cracking in young coconut has been the physiological disorder that makes the grower in
Thailand losing both production and income. Although, causes of this disorder have not been known
obviously but we found that the difference between day-night temperature and day-night relative
humidity in the duration of fruit cracking were wider than those in the duration of non-fruit cracking. Besides,
the fluctuation of relative humidity in the duration of fruit cracking was more than those in the duration of
non-fruit cracking. Thus, the fluctuation of climate may effect on the coconut fruit cracking. The objective
of this research was to investigate effect of watering frequency on fruit cracking reduction in ‘Nam Hom’
coconut. The experiment was conducted in coconut orchard at Damnoen Saduak district, Ratchaburi
province during November 2013 – March 2014. The results showed that the watering frequency at 2 and


3 day per time significantly reduced the percentage of fruit cracking compared to control (7 day per time)
in December 2013, January 2014 and March 2014. However, in some sampling date, there was no
significant difference in the percentage of fruit cracking but more watering frequency trended to give the
less percentage of fruit cracking than control. Moreover, the data analysis of percentage of fruit cracking
averaged from all of sampling date showed that the watering frequency at 2 and 3 day per time
significantly reduced the percentage of fruit cracking (38.70 and 29.34 %, respectively) compared to
control (7 day per time) (60.40 %). However, the watering frequency did not have any effect on external
and internal coconut fruit quality. Therefore, more watering frequency might reduce the fruit cracking in
‘Nam Hom’ coconut.

Article Details

How to Cite
นาถวรานันต์ พ. (2016). Effect of watering frequency on fruit cracking in ‘Nam Hom’ coconut. King Mongkut’s Agricultural Journal, 34(3), 39–47. retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/agritechjournal/article/view/180796
Section
Research Articles

References

Byers, R.E., D.H. Carbaugh and C.N. Presley. 1990. Stayman fruit cracking as affected by surfactants, plant growth
regulators, and other chemicals. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115: 405-411.
Christensen, J.V. 1996. Rain-induced fruit cracking of sweet cherries: Its cause and prevention, pp 297-327. In A.D. Webster
and N.E. Looney, eds. Cherries: Crop Physiology, Production and Uses. Cab International, U.K. 445 p.
Cline, J.A. and M. Trought. 2007. Effect of gibberellic acid on fruit cracking and quality of Bing and Sam sweet cherries.
Canadian J Plant Sci. 87(3):545-550.
Davenport, D.C., K. Uriu and R.H. Hagen. 1972. Antitranspirant film: curtailing intake of external water by cherry fruit to reduce
cracking. Hortsci. 7: 507-508.
French, R.D. 2011. Fruit cracking of tomato. Texas AgriLife Extension Service; The Texas A&M System
Glenn, M.G. and B.W. Poovaiah. 1989. Cuticular properties and postharvest calcium application influence cracking of sweet
cherries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114: 781-788.
Masarirambi, M.T., N. Mhazo, T.O. Oseni and V.D. Shongwe. 2009. Common physiological disorders of tomato
(Lycopersicon esculentum) fruit found in Swaziland. J. Agric. Soc. Sci. 5: 123–127
Ohta, K., N. Ito, T. Hosoki and Y. Sugi. 1991. Influence of relative humidity on fruit cracking of cherry tomato grown in
hydroponic culture and its control. J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci. 60: 337-343.
Opara, U.L., C.J. Studman, and N.H. Banks. 1997. Fruit skin splitting and cracking. Hort. Review. 19: 217-262.
Simon, G. 2006. Review on rain induced fruit cracking of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.) its causes and the possibilities
of prevention. J. Hort. Sci. 12(3): 27-35.
Tongumpai, P. 1993. Strategies for machine harvesting of mature coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) fruit. Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State
University, Corvallis.
Uriu, K., C.J. Hanson and J.J. Smith. 1962. The cracking of prunes in relation to irrigation. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 80:
211-219.