Effect of Ensiling a Total Mixed Ration on Chemical Composition and Fermentation Quality
Main Article Content
Abstract
The approach of using high-moisture agricultural by-products with ensiling technology will improve feed efficiency. This research aimed to assess the impact of ensiling on chemical composition and sensory characteristics of silage quality with different ingredients. The experimental design was a completely randomized design (CRD). The treatments were Napier grass silage as control, fermented total mixed ration with Napier grass (FTMR - Napier grass) and fermented total mixed ration with rice straw (FTMR - rice straw), all of which were packed in plastic bags (25 kilogram) under ensilage condition. The bags were opened after 0, 7, 21 and 60 days in ensiling. The result showed that the content of dry matter and crude protein ranged 35.34-42.50 and 11.62-11.98, respectively. The silage had lower dry matter than the fermented total mixed ration, whereas there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the content of crude protein. There was a significant difference (P<0.001) in pH value among experimental diet. The lowest pH value of fermented total mixed ration and Napier grass silage were obtained after 7 and 21 days of ensiling, respectively. In addition, Napier grass silage had higher pH value than fermented total mixed ration (P<0.001). The Napier grass had lower ensiling quality score than FTMR (P<0.001). By contrast, the score was not statistically different between FTMR –Napier grass and FTMR – rice straw. However, all experimental diets were in good and very good rang of ensilage. These results indicate that Napier grass silage and fermented total mixed ration should be used after 21 and 7 days of ensiling, respectively. The fermentation technology could preserve feed in plastic bags (25 kilograms) for 60 days.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
King Mongkut's Agricultural Journal
References
Association of Official Chemists [AOAC]. (1995). Official method of analysis of analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 16th ed. Washington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists International.
Borreani, G., Tabacco, E., Schmidt, R. J., Holmes, B. J. & Muck, R. E. (2018). Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. Journal of Dairy Science. 101(5), 3952-3979.
Bretschneider, G., Mattera, J., Cuatrin, A., Arias, D. & Wanzenried, R. (2015). Effect of ensiling a total mixed ration on feed quality for cattle in smallholder dairy farms. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 47(2), 225-229.
Bueno, A. V. I., Lazzari, G., Jobim, C. C. & Daniel, J. L. P. (2020). Ensiling Total Mixed Ration for Ruminants: A Review. Agronomy. 10(6), 879.
Cai, Y., Benno, Y., Ogawa, M., Ohmomo, S., Kumai, S. & Nakase, T. (1998). Influence of Lactobacillus spp. From an Inoculant and of Weissella and Leuconostoc spp. From Forage Crops on Silage Fermentation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 64(8), 2982-2987.
Galyean, M. L. (1989). Laboratory procedures in animal nutrition research. Lubbock: Department of Animal and Food Science, Texas Tech University.
Gerlach, K., Daniel, J. L. P., Jobim, C. C. & Nussio, L. G. (2021). A data analysis on the effect of acetic acid on dry matter intake in dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology. (272), 114782.
Kamphayae, S., Kumagai, H., Bureenok, S., Narmseelee, R. & Butcha, P. (2017). Effects of graded levels of liquid brewer’s yeast on chemical composition and fermentation quality in cassava pulp and rice straw-based total mixed ration silage. Animal Science Journal. 88(4), 618-624.
Kongphitee, K., Sommart, K., Phonbumrung, T., Gunha, T. & Suzuki, T. (2018). Feed intake, digestibility and energy partitioning in beef cattle fed diets with cassava pulp instead of rice straw. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 31(9), 1431-1441.
Kaiser, A. G., Piltz, J. W., Burns, H. M. & Griffiths, N. W. (2003). Successful Silage. Australia: Dairy Research and Development Corporation and New South Wales Agriculture.
Martínez, R. M., Mezquita, P. C., Bermúdez, P. & Muñoz, R. B. (2012). Use of food wastes for the production of lactic silage. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 55(1), 115-126.
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (2002). Animal Nutrition. 6th ed. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., J Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Morgan, C. A., Sinclair, L. A. & Wilkinson R. G. (2011). Animal Nutrition. 7th ed. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
McDonald, P., Henderson, A. R. & Heron S. J. E. (1991). The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. EdCenterbury, UK: Chalcombe publications.
Meenongyai, W., Virote, P., Stelzleni, A., Sethakul, J. & Duangjinda, M. (2017). Effects of forage ensiling and ration fermentation on total mixed ration pH, ruminal fermentation and performance of growing Holstein-Zebu cross steers. Animal Science Journal. 88(9), 1372-1379.
Muck, R. E. (2010). Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 39 (suppl spe), 183-191.
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute (SAS). (1998). SAS/STAT User’s Guid 6. Version 9.1. 12th ed. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.
Subepang, S., Suzuki, T., Phonbumrung, T., & Sommart, K. (2019). Enteric methane emissions, energy partitioning, and energetic efficiency of zebu beef cattle fed total mixed ration silage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 32(4), 548-555.
The Working Committee of Thai Feeding Standard for Ruminant [WTSR]. (2010). Nutrient requirement of beef cattle in Indochinese Peninsula. Khon Kaen: Klungnanavithaya Press.
Varunee, P., Phaikaew, C., Promma, S., Chinvarol, S., Arananant, J., Ritruechai, W. & Angthong, W. (2004). Silage standards of animal nutrition division. Bangkok, Thailand: The Agricultural co-operative federation of Thailand. Ltd.