Communication Strategies for Behavioral Change in Highland Farmers to Address PM 2.5 Pollution in Chiang Rai Province, Thailand

Main Article Content

Surachai Srinorajan
Phacharaporn Tadee
Wiwat Pattanawong

Abstract

       This research aimed to investigate the problems and behavioral patterns related to agricultural residue burning among highland farmers in Chiang Rai Province and to develop communication approaches for behavioral change. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) methodology grounded primarily in qualitative research approaches. The research was conducted in Chiang Rai Province with 25 key informants who were selected through purposive sampling, including farmers, community leaders, government officers, and model farmers. In addition, focus group discussions with 30 participants. Data were collection through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and data credibility was verified through triangulation. The findings are divided into two phases. In the Research Phase, the study revealed that agricultural residue burning among highland farmers was not primarily caused by a lack of knowledge or environmental awareness. Rather, it stemmed from complex structural constraints, including steep mountainous terrain that limited the use of agricultural machinery, low market prices for agricultural residues that were not economically worthwhile, and rotational farming practices deeply embedded in the cultural identity of ethnic communities. Based on these findings, the Development Phase led to the creation of an integrated communication framework “Plook, Plain, Prab” (Plant, Change, Adapt). The framework consisted of four strategic communication levels: (1) economic incentive communication through concrete cost–benefit comparisons, (2) the development of model areas and experiential learning processes, (3) the utilization of community leaders and local networks as communication intermediaries, and (4) participatory motivational activities. The proposed model emphasized addressing structural root causes, creating positive incentives, and fostering community consensus rather than relying on coercive measures or negative campaigning. Ultimately, the framework aimed to contribute to the sustainable reduction of PM 2.5 pollution in the highland areas of Northern Thailand.

Article Details

How to Cite
Srinorajan, S., Tadee, P., & Pattanawong, W. (2026). Communication Strategies for Behavioral Change in Highland Farmers to Address PM 2.5 Pollution in Chiang Rai Province, Thailand. King Mongkut’s Agricultural Journal, e0271246. https://doi.org/10.55003/kmaj.2026.271246
Section
Research Articles

References

Adeleke, A., Apidechkul, T., Kanthawee, P., Suma, Y., & Wongnuch, P. (2017). Contributing factors and impacts of open burning in Thailand: Perspectives from farmers in Chiang Rai province, Thailand. Journal of Health Research, 31(2), 159–167. https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhealthres/article/view/79755.

Akahoshi, K., Zusman, E., Hanaoka, T., Kim Oanh, N. T., Huy, L. N., Wangwongwatana, S., Homyok, P., Malley, C. S., Hirayama, T., Goto, Y., Kawashima, K., & Amann, M. (2024). The prospects of controlling open burning of crop residues in Thailand: A quantitative assessment of implementation barriers and costs. Atmosphere, 15(11), 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111309.

Amnuaylojaroen, T., Kaewkanchanawong, P., & Panpeng, P. (2023). Distribution and meteorological control of PM 2.5 and its effect on visibility in northern Thailand. Atmosphere, 14(3), 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14030538.

Chansuebsri, S., Kolar, P., Kraisitnitikul, P., Kantarawilawan, N., Yabueng, N., Wiriya, W., Thepnuan, D., & Chantara, S. (2024). Chemical composition and origins of PM 2.5 in Chiang Mai (Thailand) by integrated source apportionment and potential source areas. Atmospheric Environment, 327(1), 120517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120517.

Chatterjee, J. S., Thongprasert, S., & Some, S. (2024). Communication, climate mitigation, and behavior change interventions: Understanding message design and digital media technologies. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 49(1), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-121322-070317.

Hombuppha, S., Sapsuengthong, S., Tiaonukuntham, B., & Sapsuengthong, W. (2020). The development of integrated farming system in order to solve the smog pollution problem from burning agricultural areas. Graduate Review Nakhon Sawan Buddhist College, 8(2), 1-16. (in Thai).

Inlaung, K., Chotamonsak, C., Lapyai, P., Maturaporn, T., & Surapipith, V. (2024). Assessment of transboundary PM 2.5 from biomass burning in northern Thailand using the WRF-Chem model. Toxics, 12(7), 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12070462.

Jansawek, W., Kheerajit, C., & Dokmaithes, R. (2025). Development of public relations media to reduce burning in agricultural areas, Wang Kai Thuen subdistrict, Hankha district, Chainat province. STOU Journal of Agriculture, 7(2), 17–29. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/stouagjournal/article/view/282177. (in Thai).

Jiwju, N. (2024). The impact of cost management of smallholder farmers on competitive advantage from zero-burn agriculture Mae Sot district, Tak province. Journal of Social Science for Local Development Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, 8(4), 287-298. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/soc-rmu/article/view/272550. (in Thai).

Kaewjaroon, T. (2026). The study of farmers’ decision to reduce the burning of rice residue, Phitsanulok and Sukhothai provinces. The Journal of Spatial Innovation Development (JSID), 7(2), 145-164. (in Thai).

Nakwangsai, K., & Funkhiaw, A. (2025). Community participation in developing a charter for Zero-Burn agriculture in Mae Kasa subdistrict, Mae Sot district, Tak province. DRIRDI Research for Community Service Journal, 11(1), 1–12. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DRURDI/article/view/274713. (in Thai).

Sereenonchai, S., & Arunrat, N. (2023). Urban agriculture in Thailand: Adoption factors and communication guidelines to promote long-term practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010001.

Suhardiman, D., Moo, S. S. B., Vaddhanaphuti, C., & Twa, P. S. (2026). Firebreaks as indigenous knowledge system and cultural practice: An emerging counternarrative in forest fire governance. World Development, 198(1), 107224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107224.