Factors Affecting Farming at the Household Level in Accordance with the Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy of Farmers in U-mong Municipality, Meuang District, Lamphun Province
Keywords:
household farming, sufficiency farming, philosophy of sufficiency economyAbstract
This study was conducted to investigate: 1) socio-economic attributes of farmers in U-mong sub-district, Muang Lamphun district, Lamphun province; 2) knowledge, attitudes, and farming practice at the household level in accordance with the philosophy of sufficiency economy of the farmers; 3) factors effecting farming practice of the farmers; and 4) problems encountered and suggestions about farming practice at the household level in accordance with the philosophy of sufficiency economy. The simple group of study consisted of 272 farmers in U-mong sub-district, Muang Lamphun district, Lamphun province and they were obtained by two-stage sampling. A set of questionnaires was used data collection and analysis by using descriptive statistics i.e. frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. Besides, inferential statistics was employed i.e. enter multiple regression analysis.This study was conducted to investigate: 1) socio-economic attributes of farmers in U-mong sub-district, Muang Lamphun district, Lamphun province; 2) knowledge, attitudes, and farming practice at the household level in accordance with the philosophy of sufficiency economy of the farmers; 3) factors effecting farming practice of the farmers; and 4) problems encountered and suggestions about farming practice at the household level in accordance with the philosophy of sufficiency economy. The simple group of study consisted of 272 farmers in U-mong sub-district, Muang Lamphun district, Lamphun province and they were obtained by two-stage sampling. A set of questionnaires was used data collection and analysis by using descriptive statistics i.e. frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. Besides, inferential statistics was employed i.e. enter multiple regression analysis. Results of the study revealed that most of the respondents were made, 61 years old on average, married, and elementary school graduates and lower. They had 4 family members and 2 household workers on average. They had farming area for 3.56 rai with an income earned form agricultural sector for 86,234.30 Baht per year on average. They had experience in farming for 28 years on average and joined 3 agricultural groups on average. They contacted agricultural personal and joined educational trip for twice a year on average. Besides, they joined agricultural tradition or activities for 3 times a year on average. They received data or information about farming practice in accordance with the philosophy of sufficiency economy through various media for 27 times per month on average. The respondents’ perceived farming practice in accordance with sufficiency economy at a high level. They had a highest level of agreement in terms of their attitude towards farming practice in accordance with sufficiency economy. However, they had a high level of a high level of farming practice at the household level in accordance with sufficiency economy. Findings also showed that factors positively effecting with a statistical significance level about farming practices at the household level in accordance with sufficiency economy were: marital status, joining agricultural groups, joining educational trip or training, knowledge about sufficiency farming, and attitude towards sufficiency farming. However, farming area was a factor having a negative effect with a statistical significance level. For problems encountered in farming practice at the household level in accordance with sufficiency economy, it included water shortage in the dry season, disease and insect pests break out, high production costs, and low price of agricultural yields. The following were suggestions: 1) it should have the development of water sources for agricultural purposes; 2) support on body of knowledge and new agricultural technology; and 3) promotion of farmer group farming for selling agricultural yields.
References
Barlthaisong, K. and N. Pinpradit. 2011. Understanding and participation in the philosophy of sufficiency economy, popular policies and effects of an integrated learning activities. KKU Research Journal (Graduate Studies) 11(1): 139-150. [in Thai]
Chandrabao, W., S. Terapongtanakorn and P. Intanon. 2013. The development of agro-forestry by the sufficiency economy model: a case study of farmers in four districts of Udon Thani province. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ubon Ratchathani University 4(2): 131-150. [in Thai]
Chunsiripong, C. 2007. An overview: Thai agricultural economy. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Burapha University 15(23-24): 169-184. [in Thai]
Kanjanasamranwong, P. 2017. Principles of Statistics. Nonthaburi: IDC Premier. 568 p. [in Thai]
Khumhome, B. and S. Juntarukka. 2015. The model application of sufficiency economy philosophy of the students, the faculty of management science, Ubon Ratchathani university. Panyapiwat Journal 7(Special Issue): 86-98. [in Thai]
Kusagayavong, A. 2009. Applying the royal initiative about sufficiency economy in developing the economy of Chumporn, Ranong and Suratthani provinces. Chulalongkorn Business Review 31(3): 47-62. [in Thai]
Lakmuang, K., A. Ratanachai and P. Phapatigul. 2016. Factors related to attitude on sufficiency economy philosophy of rice farmers in Songkhla province. Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal 44(1): 75-82. [in Thai]
Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. 2011. Agricultural Development Plan during the Eleventh National Economic and Social Development Plan (2012-2016). Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. 122 p. [in Thai]
Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. 2016. Agricultural Development Plan during the Twelfth National Economic and Social Development Plan (2017-2021). Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. 66 p. [in Thai]
National Statistical Office. 2017. The 2017 Household Survey on the Use of Information and Communication Technology. [Online]. Available http://www.nso.go.th/sites/2014/DocLib13/ICT/Household technology/2560/FullReportICT_60.pdf (5 April 2018).
Office of Agricultural Economics. 2017. Information of Agricultural Economics Product Lists in 2016. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. 111 p. [in Thai]
Office of the National Economics and Social Development Board. 2016. The Twelfth National Economic and Social Development Plan (2017-2021). Bangkok: Office of the National Economics and Social Development Board, Prime Minister's Office. 215 p. [in Thai]
Office of the National Economics and Social Development Board. 2018. The 20-Year National Strategy Draft. [Online]. Available http://www.nesdb.go.th/download/document/SAC/NS_DraftplanJune2018F.pdf (5 April 2018).
Phengsawat, W. 2010. Applied Statistics for Social Science Research. Bangkok: Suveeriyasarn. 428 p. [in Thai]
Prasit-rathasint, S. 2002. Applications of Statistical Methods in Research. Bangkok: Fueang Fa Printing House. 352 p. [in Thai]
Ratanapeantamma, W. 2015. Agriculture refined (Kaset Praneet) model for the Elderly. Rom Phruek Journal 33(3): 75-96. [in Thai]
Sakkatat, P. and P. Kruekum. 2017. Factors affecting organic or chemical agricultural practice of farmers in Chiang Mai. Journal of Agricultural Research and Extension 34(3): 66-77. [in Thai]
Suwatthi, P. 1998. Principles of statistics. NIDA Development Journal 38(3): 103-130. [in Thai]
Tantivejkul, S. 2016. Taibueng Phrayukolbat (In His Majesty's Footsteps). Bangkok: Matichon. 320 p. [in Thai]
Yamane, T. 1973. Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. Bangkok: Harper International. 886 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Agricultural Research and Extension

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows others to share the article with proper attribution to the authors and prohibits commercial use or modification. For any other reuse or republication, permission from the journal and the authors is required.