Farmers’ Opinions towards the Interdependency of their Community in Small Scale Irrigation System, Chiang Mai

Authors

  • Pattarasuda Joblaew Department of Agricultural Economy and Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University
  • Juthathip Chalermphol Department of Agricultural Economy and Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University
  • Ruth Sirisunyaluck Department of Agricultural Economy and Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University

Keywords:

interdependence, obstacles in agricultural occupation, agricultural community

Abstract

The main purpose of this research was to study the relationship between obstacles in agricultural occupation and the interdependence of people in the community. The sample group was 589 farmers living in an area under a small scale irrigation system in Chiang Mai. Data was collected via questionnaires and analyzed using statistics including frequency, percentage, minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation, and Pearson’s product moment. The results showed that 79.12% of farmers were male, lived in the community for an average of 48.54 years, had an average income from agriculture of 3,060.32 Baht per month, and most (73.68%) had debt. Farmers’ overall opinion was at the level of agreeing that people in the community could be interdependent ( gif.latex?\bar{x}=2.72). They agreed that most of the people in their community were honest and trustworthy, willing to help when needed, and ready to help when there was an urgent matter. Farmers’ obstacles to farming were the fast–changing price of inputs, uncertain product price, and collapse of irrigation infrastructure. This study revealed that obstacles in occupation were significantly correlated with interdependency (r=0.113). This means that the higher the level of occupational obstacles, the more interdependency of the community.

References

Brennan, M.L. 2013. The importance of interdependence. [Online]. Available https://psychcentral.com/blog/balanced-life/2013/06/the-importance-of-interdependence#1 (November 27, 2021).

Intria, M. 2017. Social capital. Narkbhutparitat Journal 9(2): 14-25. [in Thai]

Junthapong, S. and P. Thepkham. 2018. Agricultural innovation: solution to Thailand's inequality problem part 1. [Online]. Available https://www.bot.or.th/Thai/ResearchAndPublications/DocLib_/Article_11Apr2018.pdf (December 10, 2020). [in Thai]

Open textbooks for Hong Kong. 2016. Communication, interdependence, and group structure. [Online]. Available http://www.opentextbooks.org.hk/ditatopic/17339 (December 10, 2020).

Petcharat, C., P. Phocherd and B. Kuensuwong. 2019. Agricultural production patterns of rural Thai households’ data from Townsend Thai data. [Online]. Available https://www.pier.or.th/abridged/2019/10/#top (December 10, 2020). [in Thai]

Phongrattananugul, S. and D. Sirikanchanarak. n.d. Irrigation system and Thai agriculture. [Online]. Available https://www.bot.or.th/Thai/MonetaryPolicy/Northern/DocLib_Article/ThailandIrrigationAgriSector (November 27, 2021). [in Thai]

Posita, C. 2012. Rural Thai villages in capitalism. The Journal of the Royal Society of Thailand 37(4): 163-185. [in Thai]

Punyasing, S. 2014. Self-development and indicators of farming families’ well-being in accordance with sufficiency economy philosophy approach in Northeast Thailand. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Khon Kaen University 31(3): 121-138. [in Thai]

Thailand Plus. 2018. Community way of life agriculture. [Online]. Available https://www.thailandplus.tv/archives/1777 (December 10, 2020). [in Thai]

Weeraphanpong, A. 2014. Factors influencing self-reliance community: the case of Klongladmayom Community, Talingchan, Bangkok. Governance Journal 3(1): 59-82. [in Thai]

Yamane, T. 1973. Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. 3rd. New York: Harper and Row Publication. 1130 p.

Published

2023-08-22

How to Cite

Joblaew, P., Chalermphol, J. ., & Sirisunyaluck, R. . (2023). Farmers’ Opinions towards the Interdependency of their Community in Small Scale Irrigation System, Chiang Mai . Journal of Agricultural Research and Extension, 40(2), 172–183. retrieved from https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MJUJN/article/view/248550

Issue

Section

Research Article